no_vaseline_IHB
New member
Given the MBA foreclosure data they reported today that I cited in "Headlines" theres no way in hell I'd buy today. If somebody gave me the money I'd continue to rent.
rickhunter said:So I should be asking you this question...
Would you like to own for 10 years and have all the benefits that come with it?
Or
Would you like to rent for 10 years and have all the benefits that come with it?
rickhunter said:You can buy the home you would want to stay in for 10 years and still move up.
Your earning power should increase by then.
Your wants and needs should have changed.
socalhousingbubble said:rickhunter said:You can buy the home you would want to stay in for 10 years and still move up.
Your earning power should increase by then.
Your wants and needs should have changed.
Your scenario says the price in 10 years will be the same as it is now. It doesn't say it will remain the same for 10 years.
If one's earning power increases but one is underwater on the home and decides at year 5 needs have changed and a move is necessary, bring money to the table or forget about it.
And said knifecatcher is shackled to the home, which will undermine the ability to relocate to increase earning power.
BAD, BAD idea. Might as well sign a 10-year lease and save the money.
-SCHB
Please explain.rickhunter said:You might not be able to afford RENT!
irvine_home_owner said:Please explain.rickhunter said:You might not be able to afford RENT!
If you cannot afford to rent, how can you afford to pay your mortgage?
Like I said in my previous post, this depends on rental parity... as long as you can rent an SFR for less than buying it... why would you do otherwise? Especially if the house is going to be worth the same money 10 years later.
IrvineRenter said:A bullish thread... I like it.
The headline on the thread is not the argument you are making in the comments. Saying that prices will be the same as today's 10 years from now is not saying that today is the bottom.
I would ask the question this way: "If you knew prices were going to be the same 10 years from now, and if it seemed very likely that they would be 20% cheaper 2 years from now, would you buy today?"
rickhunter said:My scenario if for a 30 year fixed 20% down SFR.
You can bring a bad/worst case scenario like losing a job/medical bills into the picture but
At that point, whether you're a buying the home for a 20% or 40% discount, would it even matter?
You might not be able to afford RENT!
IrvineRenter said:A bullish thread... I like it.
The headline on the thread is not the argument you are making in the comments. Saying that prices will be the same as today's 10 years from now is not saying that today is the bottom.
I would ask the question this way: "If you knew prices were going to be the same 10 years from now, and if it seemed very likely that they would be 20% cheaper 2 years from now, would you buy today?"
IrvineRenter said:A bullish thread... I like it.
The headline on the thread is not the argument you are making in the comments. Saying that prices will be the same as today's 10 years from now is not saying that today is the bottom.
I would ask the question this way: "If you knew prices were going to be the same 10 years from now, and if it seemed very likely that they would be 20% cheaper 2 years from now, would you buy today?"
No_Such_Reality said:When the kool-aid runs dry, there aren't going to be bidding wars for tract homes.
In fact, with 1.25 Million jobs lost in the last three months nationwide and a $14 Billion dollar shortfall in the State budget, they will be lucky to get bids at all.
caycifish said:This thread is starting to turn into yet another one where folks put their stat of choice, whether it be national, California, Southern California, OC, or Irvine stats, all into a blender, and then you hit "Mix" without putting the top on, and then everyone goes running around the kitchen screaming while random stats come flying out and hit random people's shirts.
caycifish said:This thread is starting to turn into yet another one where folks put their stat of choice, whether it be national, California, Southern California, OC, or Irvine stats, all into a blender, and then you hit "Mix" without putting the top on, and then everyone goes running around the kitchen screaming while random stats come flying out and hit random people's shirts.
And I can assure you that there is very little to no demand for track houses in Anaheim. Irvine, sure.
Would I buy the house I want in Tustin today if I was assured it would stay the same price for 10 years? Nope. I'd wait until my earning/buying power had increased and inflation had eaten away at the price of the house such that the house became affordable.
rickhunter said:So it's an affordability issue for you. Not that you cant "afford" it, but that you want it to be more affordable?
So would you say that if price for the home that you want do not go to the scale of earning/buying power you're at,
you will never buy? Or would you settle for your 2nd, 3rd choice that would make it more affordable?
caycifish said:This thread is starting to turn into yet another one where folks put their stat of choice, whether it be national, California, Southern California, OC, or Irvine stats, all into a blender, and then you hit "Mix" without putting the top on, and then everyone goes running around the kitchen screaming while random stats come flying out and hit random people's shirts.
And I can assure you that there is very little to no demand for track houses in Anaheim. Irvine, sure.
Would I buy the house I want in Tustin today if I was assured it would stay the same price for 10 years? Nope. I'd wait until my earning/buying power had increased and inflation had eaten away at the price of the house such that the house became affordable.
caycifish said:This thread is starting to turn into yet another one where folks put their stat of choice, whether it be national, California, Southern California, OC, or Irvine stats, all into a blender, and then you hit "Mix" without putting the top on, and then everyone goes running around the kitchen screaming while random stats come flying out and hit random people's shirts.
And I can assure you that there is very little to no demand for track houses in Anaheim. Irvine, sure.
Would I buy the house I want in Tustin today if I was assured it would stay the same price for 10 years? Nope. I'd wait until my earning/buying power had increased and inflation had eaten away at the price of the house such that the house became affordable.