The thing that is striking to me about this calculator is how much of a difference 1% in annual price appreciation makes. I plugged in the following parameters:
Rent: $2500, Buy: $650,000 Down Payment: 10% Rate: 6.25% Tax Rate: 1.9% (I am including Mello Roos on new homes for an effective rate) , Home Appreciation 4% annual, Rent Increase 3% annual
Results: Buying is only better than renting after 27 years! At year five, renting would have cost roughly 60K less than buying. This doesnt even factor in outlay that goes towards HOA's....
When you keep all factors the same, except you just increase annual appreciation from 4% to 5%:
Results: Buying is better than renting after 7 years!! At year five renting would have cost roughly 25K less than buying.
You are talking about a 20 year long-term difference, and $35K difference after 5 years due to one percentage point of annual price appreciation?!? Are we really betting on as little as a single percentage point of annual price appreciation?! Of course, I understand all the arguments of FALLING prices and how long it might take us from this point to even see 5% annual price appreciation year-over-year, but one percentage point seems like such a small amount to "predict" that makes such a big difference in the comparison....