IrvineRenter_IHB
New member
<strong>I received the following email from a reader outlining the problems he is witnessing among friends, coworkers, family members and others he knows:
If you have any stories you want to share, this is a place to do it.</strong>
.
My wife and I were recently discussing how many people we know who are in way over their heads with real estate, some of them know it, and some of them apparently do not (not that that changes their reality). Here are a handful of quick examples off the top of my head:
1) The "owner" of the home we are leasing in Orange County. A serial Mortgage Equity Withdrawal abuser, he owes $749k on a $450k home. He also bought $2.24M home in 2006 with $100k (!) down...and he is currently being foreclosed on. He is filing for BK and will lose both homes.
2) Sister-in-law and husband bought a 53 year old POS on peninsula in "Real Bay Area" near peak in 2006 with 10-year interest only. They could not afford a conventional loan, and have since added a new SUV, a baby, a new roof, and now are trying to have a second child. Meanwhile, the sister-in-law is concerned about losing her job. Comps in their neighborhood show they are down about 15% currently. They were banking solely on appreciation; they will not be able to afford their recast in 2016. My bet is they will lose this home.
3) Cousin in East Bay. Bought at peak for $1.1M, home now worth approx. $850K. Used money he pulled out of another home he owns in neighboring East Bay town to buy the $1.1M home. Now that money is gone, and he owes $700k on their second home, which is worth about $500k now. Will lose the one home for sure, perhaps not the second, though he'd be better off financially, in the long run, if he did.
4) Wife's friend from San Diego who bought two "investment properties" in Arizona back in 2005-6, with 40-year Interest Only mortgages. Has no idea what she got into. Will lose both homes.
5) Friend in military who bought condo "investment" in New Jersey with V/A no-money down loan. Now way under water, is acting paralyzed and seems unable to act on sound advice to help him out of the situation. He will lose this home.
6) Another wife's friend who bought a condo in downtown San Diego with a toxic mortgage. Here and her boyfriend are way under water, and will lose this home.
These are six examples of former buyers who will *not* be buying homes any time soon. The pool of potential buyers is shriking due to this sort of phenomenon. If my wife and I can quickly come up with six examples of friends and family who are in way over their heads, imagine how many other examples there are out there, that aren't being accurately accounted for in forecasts, estimates, etc. My intution tells me there are a lot of "stealth" timebombs like the ones mentioned above that will be going off the next few years, continuing to add to the downward pressure on real estate prices.
Another example close to home that I completely forgot about: one of my wife's younger employees bought her first home (condo) in Jan 2006 for $440k with a toxic mortgage, and just realized she is in deep trouble when a neighbor's comp. condo is now up for sale asking $335k.
The list goes on and on. I happen to pay close attention to this stuff, and have contacts who run checks for me (SiteX, etc.) related to one of the larger positions that I hold. But I bet if more of you actually knew the real numbers for your family, friends, and coworkers, you'd be shocked at how many people are way, way over leveraged, and are going to be in for some tough times ahead.
As Mr. Mortgage has pointed out, all of the people who face similar situations, who were prior buyers (borrowers) before, are and will remain removed from the buyer pool for quite some time. I have not seen this phenomenon accurately measured and/or forecasted, but it will no doubt have a strong, long-lasting negative effect on home prices trying to recover.
My wife's former senior partner bought an $875k place in Laguna with a 5-year Interest Only in 2005, and enjoyed the taste of the Kool-Aid so much that he bought another home, two doors down, in 2006, for $1.35M....again, with a 5-year Interest Only. He's under water on both of the places, and his "pre" and "during" bubble behavior is quickly catching up to him, from what someone told us the other night. What's that I hear? "Tick, tick, tick.....kaboom" goes the bubble areas.
As I stated previously, if you have an aunt in Idaho who owns her $56k home, and an uncle in Modesto who has a $148k home with $100k in equity, great. They sound like very nice people, and probably made wise real estate decisions. But they weren't the same people responsible for the bubble prices, and a vast majority of those who were are in a hurt locker right now, whether they realize it or not.
And if you do live in a bubble area, and you were able to run numbers on a handful of your neighbors, coworkers, and friends, you'd very likely see that a high percentage of them have a lot more debt (over-leveraged, mortgage debt, in this case) than you may be aware. But because you aren't aware of it doesn't mean it isn't rampant; the statistics back up my observations.
The s*#@ storm for the guy mentioned above will not rain down fully on him until 2010 for the first loan and 2011 for the second......look out below the next couple years, my peeps!
If you have any stories you want to share, this is a place to do it.</strong>
.
My wife and I were recently discussing how many people we know who are in way over their heads with real estate, some of them know it, and some of them apparently do not (not that that changes their reality). Here are a handful of quick examples off the top of my head:
1) The "owner" of the home we are leasing in Orange County. A serial Mortgage Equity Withdrawal abuser, he owes $749k on a $450k home. He also bought $2.24M home in 2006 with $100k (!) down...and he is currently being foreclosed on. He is filing for BK and will lose both homes.
2) Sister-in-law and husband bought a 53 year old POS on peninsula in "Real Bay Area" near peak in 2006 with 10-year interest only. They could not afford a conventional loan, and have since added a new SUV, a baby, a new roof, and now are trying to have a second child. Meanwhile, the sister-in-law is concerned about losing her job. Comps in their neighborhood show they are down about 15% currently. They were banking solely on appreciation; they will not be able to afford their recast in 2016. My bet is they will lose this home.
3) Cousin in East Bay. Bought at peak for $1.1M, home now worth approx. $850K. Used money he pulled out of another home he owns in neighboring East Bay town to buy the $1.1M home. Now that money is gone, and he owes $700k on their second home, which is worth about $500k now. Will lose the one home for sure, perhaps not the second, though he'd be better off financially, in the long run, if he did.
4) Wife's friend from San Diego who bought two "investment properties" in Arizona back in 2005-6, with 40-year Interest Only mortgages. Has no idea what she got into. Will lose both homes.
5) Friend in military who bought condo "investment" in New Jersey with V/A no-money down loan. Now way under water, is acting paralyzed and seems unable to act on sound advice to help him out of the situation. He will lose this home.
6) Another wife's friend who bought a condo in downtown San Diego with a toxic mortgage. Here and her boyfriend are way under water, and will lose this home.
These are six examples of former buyers who will *not* be buying homes any time soon. The pool of potential buyers is shriking due to this sort of phenomenon. If my wife and I can quickly come up with six examples of friends and family who are in way over their heads, imagine how many other examples there are out there, that aren't being accurately accounted for in forecasts, estimates, etc. My intution tells me there are a lot of "stealth" timebombs like the ones mentioned above that will be going off the next few years, continuing to add to the downward pressure on real estate prices.
Another example close to home that I completely forgot about: one of my wife's younger employees bought her first home (condo) in Jan 2006 for $440k with a toxic mortgage, and just realized she is in deep trouble when a neighbor's comp. condo is now up for sale asking $335k.
The list goes on and on. I happen to pay close attention to this stuff, and have contacts who run checks for me (SiteX, etc.) related to one of the larger positions that I hold. But I bet if more of you actually knew the real numbers for your family, friends, and coworkers, you'd be shocked at how many people are way, way over leveraged, and are going to be in for some tough times ahead.
As Mr. Mortgage has pointed out, all of the people who face similar situations, who were prior buyers (borrowers) before, are and will remain removed from the buyer pool for quite some time. I have not seen this phenomenon accurately measured and/or forecasted, but it will no doubt have a strong, long-lasting negative effect on home prices trying to recover.
My wife's former senior partner bought an $875k place in Laguna with a 5-year Interest Only in 2005, and enjoyed the taste of the Kool-Aid so much that he bought another home, two doors down, in 2006, for $1.35M....again, with a 5-year Interest Only. He's under water on both of the places, and his "pre" and "during" bubble behavior is quickly catching up to him, from what someone told us the other night. What's that I hear? "Tick, tick, tick.....kaboom" goes the bubble areas.
As I stated previously, if you have an aunt in Idaho who owns her $56k home, and an uncle in Modesto who has a $148k home with $100k in equity, great. They sound like very nice people, and probably made wise real estate decisions. But they weren't the same people responsible for the bubble prices, and a vast majority of those who were are in a hurt locker right now, whether they realize it or not.
And if you do live in a bubble area, and you were able to run numbers on a handful of your neighbors, coworkers, and friends, you'd very likely see that a high percentage of them have a lot more debt (over-leveraged, mortgage debt, in this case) than you may be aware. But because you aren't aware of it doesn't mean it isn't rampant; the statistics back up my observations.
The s*#@ storm for the guy mentioned above will not rain down fully on him until 2010 for the first loan and 2011 for the second......look out below the next couple years, my peeps!