California Leads the Nation in Hate Groups
- Thread starter Happiness
- Start date
NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
This
The Radical Traditional Catholic group is an extremist interpretation of Catholicism that is not recognized by the Vatican. It is their assertion that Jews are the perpetual enemy of Christ. You are defending this group and their status as a hate group under the definition of the SPC.
socal78
Well-known member
Their Hate Map is labeled with "Radical traditional Catholicism". Seriously, just look at all those radical Catholic terrorists shouting, "Praise Jesus" as they spray bullets into a crowded room of non-believers. Wait, wrong group. Well what I mean is, how dare they protect the lives of unborn babies... who would grow up to be women and people of all colors. Ugh, that is just so full of hate. If they truly loved people then they would condone hacking them into pieces and selling their body parts like Cecile Richards of Planned Parenthood. Planned Parenthood, we all know, is an example of a truly loving, unhateful organization. Gosh, why do Catholics have to be such big meanie faces?! Ugh, ugh. And ugh.
irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
Build a wall around California!!!
morekaos
Well-known member
I almost put this in the" Toyota leaving Cali" thread but it goes just as well here. Suprisingly in the LA Times....
The Oroville Dam disaster is yet another example of California's decline
A year ago, politicians and experts were predicting a near-permanent statewide drought, a ?new normal? desert climate. The most vivid example of how wrong they were is that California?s majestic Oroville Dam is currently in danger of spillway failure in a season of record snow and rainfall. That could spell catastrophe for thousands who live below it and for the state of California at large that depends on its stored water.
The poor condition of the dam is almost too good a metaphor for the condition of the state as a whole; its possible failure is a reflection of California?s civic decline.
A new generation of Californians ? without much memory of floods or what unirrigated California was like before its aqueducts ? had the luxury to envision the state?s existing water projects in a radically new light: as environmental errors. To partially correct these mistakes some proposed diverting storage water for fish restoration and re-creating of wild rivers to flow uninterrupted into San Francisco Bay.
Indeed, pressures mounted to tear down rather than build dams. The state ? whose basket of income, sales and gas taxes is among the highest in the country ? gradually shifted its priorities from the building and expansion of dams, reservoirs, aqueducts, bridges and highways to redistributionist social welfare programs, state employee pensions and an enormous penal archipelago.
The crisis at Oroville is a third act in the state?s history: One majestic generation built great dams, a second enjoyed them while they aged, and a third fiddles as they now erode.
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-hanson-oroville-20170214-story.html
The Oroville Dam disaster is yet another example of California's decline
A year ago, politicians and experts were predicting a near-permanent statewide drought, a ?new normal? desert climate. The most vivid example of how wrong they were is that California?s majestic Oroville Dam is currently in danger of spillway failure in a season of record snow and rainfall. That could spell catastrophe for thousands who live below it and for the state of California at large that depends on its stored water.
The poor condition of the dam is almost too good a metaphor for the condition of the state as a whole; its possible failure is a reflection of California?s civic decline.
A new generation of Californians ? without much memory of floods or what unirrigated California was like before its aqueducts ? had the luxury to envision the state?s existing water projects in a radically new light: as environmental errors. To partially correct these mistakes some proposed diverting storage water for fish restoration and re-creating of wild rivers to flow uninterrupted into San Francisco Bay.
Indeed, pressures mounted to tear down rather than build dams. The state ? whose basket of income, sales and gas taxes is among the highest in the country ? gradually shifted its priorities from the building and expansion of dams, reservoirs, aqueducts, bridges and highways to redistributionist social welfare programs, state employee pensions and an enormous penal archipelago.
The crisis at Oroville is a third act in the state?s history: One majestic generation built great dams, a second enjoyed them while they aged, and a third fiddles as they now erode.
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-hanson-oroville-20170214-story.html
sgip
Well-known member
If you dig back to the original source, the "Radical Traditional Catholicism" group listed are really just a base level Holocaust Denier / Anti-Semite group who may total in the tens of members. It's also a false claim to call this group "Traditional Catholicism". Does the Catholic Church have a history of anti-Semitism? Here and there, but currently? No. Is this small group dangerous? Perhaps, but a real threat given how many anti-hate groups there are? No.
Besides, we all know the real violent, anti-inclusive hate spews mostly from those goddamned Amish. Hail Hydra
My .02c
Besides, we all know the real violent, anti-inclusive hate spews mostly from those goddamned Amish. Hail Hydra
My .02c
paperboyNC
New member
morekaos said:
This
SoCal said:
The Radical Traditional Catholic group is an extremist interpretation of Catholicism that is not recognized by the Vatican. It is their assertion that Jews are the perpetual enemy of Christ. You are defending this group and their status as a hate group under the definition of the SPC.