winex said:Hi Tim, obviously you are a little unfamiliar with the concept. A "Bushism" is a term describing some malapropism of speech. When Obama says that costs are going to be reduced by 3,000%, it's Bushism because it's not possible to have a cost reduction of 3,000%. When President Bush said that there were national security reasons to take out the leader of a terrorist nation who had literally launched thousands of attacks against our country, it really does make us safer.
Anything else I can explain for you?
winex said:Hi Tim, obviously you are a little unfamiliar with the concept. A "Bushism" is a term describing some malapropism of speech. When Obama says that costs are going to be reduced by 3,000%, it's Bushism because it's not possible to have a cost reduction of 3,000%. When President Bush said that there were national security reasons to take out the leader of a terrorist nation who had literally launched thousands of attacks against our country, it really does make us safer.
Anything else I can explain for you?
Stuff It said:winex said:Hi Tim, obviously you are a little unfamiliar with the concept. A "Bushism" is a term describing some malapropism of speech. When Obama says that costs are going to be reduced by 3,000%, it's Bushism because it's not possible to have a cost reduction of 3,000%. When President Bush said that there were national security reasons to take out the leader of a terrorist nation who had literally launched thousands of attacks against our country, it really does make us safer.
Anything else I can explain for you?
Having a bad day?
winex said:Stuff It said:winex said:Hi Tim, obviously you are a little unfamiliar with the concept. A "Bushism" is a term describing some malapropism of speech. When Obama says that costs are going to be reduced by 3,000%, it's Bushism because it's not possible to have a cost reduction of 3,000%. When President Bush said that there were national security reasons to take out the leader of a terrorist nation who had literally launched thousands of attacks against our country, it really does make us safer.
Anything else I can explain for you?
Having a bad day?
No, but thanks for asking.
winex said:winex said:Stuff It said:winex said:Hi Tim, obviously you are a little unfamiliar with the concept. A "Bushism" is a term describing some malapropism of speech. When Obama says that costs are going to be reduced by 3,000%, it's Bushism because it's not possible to have a cost reduction of 3,000%. When President Bush said that there were national security reasons to take out the leader of a terrorist nation who had literally launched thousands of attacks against our country, it really does make us safer.
Anything else I can explain for you?
Having a bad day?
No, but thanks for asking.
Criticisms of President Bush and the Republican Congress for spending too much money are valid. But if you voted for Democrats for reasons of fiscal conservatism, I'd like to know how that hopey-changey thing is working for you.
Stuff It said:winex said:winex said:Stuff It said:winex said:Hi Tim, obviously you are a little unfamiliar with the concept. A "Bushism" is a term describing some malapropism of speech. When Obama says that costs are going to be reduced by 3,000%, it's Bushism because it's not possible to have a cost reduction of 3,000%. When President Bush said that there were national security reasons to take out the leader of a terrorist nation who had literally launched thousands of attacks against our country, it really does make us safer.
Anything else I can explain for you?
Having a bad day?
No, but thanks for asking.
Criticisms of President Bush and the Republican Congress for spending too much money are valid. But if you voted for Democrats for reasons of fiscal conservatism, I'd like to know how that hopey-changey thing is working for you.
I think Bush can be criticized for more things than just the budget - there was a minor thing called the Iraqi war and the lack of WMD. And no I didn't vote for the Democrats - but then again neither did I vote for the Republicans