$825 Billion Stimulus Plan

NEW -> Contingent Buyer Assistance Program
skek said:
To oversimplify things, cheap debt and easy credit resulted in an epic bubble economy causing asset prices (notably residential RE, but not solely) to divorce themselves from fundamental values and fueling irresponsible consumer spending at the expense of savings and investment. That banks leveraged themselves was a symptom of the problem, not the cause -- they leveraged themselves because the cheap credit underpriced risk and the returns seemed "to good to be true." And to preempt your next question, lax regulation and greed certainly fueled the problem.

BTW, as I type this, Ron Paul is smacking Bernanke around in the House financial services committee meeting.
Click to expand...

Doesn't the leveraging of derivative products massively amplify the problem?
 
skek said:
BTW, as I type this, Ron Paul is smacking Bernanke around in the House financial services committee meeting.
Click to expand...

Did you notice Rep. Kanjorski go after Bernanke for not stating the problem simply enough, only to have Barney Frank shut down any answer by saying "the answer will have to be provided in writing" and moving to the next question? My wife and I were both pretty shocked, considering that this was pretty relevant to everything the government is asking us to pay for in the future.

For those who don't know who Rep. Kanjorski is I suggest you take the time to watch this video... it's enlightening.

(embedded video no longer available)
 
green_cactus said:
skek said:
To oversimplify things, cheap debt and easy credit resulted in an epic bubble economy causing asset prices (notably residential RE, but not solely) to divorce themselves from fundamental values and fueling irresponsible consumer spending at the expense of savings and investment. That banks leveraged themselves was a symptom of the problem, not the cause -- they leveraged themselves because the cheap credit underpriced risk and the returns seemed "to good to be true." And to preempt your next question, lax regulation and greed certainly fueled the problem.

BTW, as I type this, Ron Paul is smacking Bernanke around in the House financial services committee meeting.
Click to expand...

Doesn't the leveraging of derivative products massively amplify the problem?
Click to expand...

Yes.
 
green_cactus said:
skek said:
To oversimplify things, cheap debt and easy credit resulted in an epic bubble economy causing asset prices (notably residential RE, but not solely) to divorce themselves from fundamental values and fueling irresponsible consumer spending at the expense of savings and investment. That banks leveraged themselves was a symptom of the problem, not the cause -- they leveraged themselves because the cheap credit underpriced risk and the returns seemed "to good to be true." And to preempt your next question, lax regulation and greed certainly fueled the problem.

BTW, as I type this, Ron Paul is smacking Bernanke around in the House financial services committee meeting.
Click to expand...

Doesn't the leveraging of derivative products massively amplify the problem?
Click to expand...
Sure, but in order to leverage, you have to be able to get cheap money and you have to actually be able to buy something with it. By the time synthetic derivatives were being traded, the die was already cast as sub-prime lenders were running out of customers. When that happened, the party was over. Even had the banks not been trading in derivatives, the fall in home prices would have occured and we would be in the exact same place, albeit without the additional worry of "toxic assets" keeping the banks from being nationalized.
 
skek said:
Umm, so consumer spending is not the problem, but Chuck is right and it's not sustainable, but we want to loosen credit and put more money in people's pocket to, presumably spend, but we need to reconsider irresponsible lending practices. Which is it, Mr. President?
Click to expand...

Clearly, you fail to appreciate the nuances in his answers.
 
BlackVault CM said:
green_cactus said:
skek said:
Forgive me for getting the name wrong, but I think it was Chuck Todd who asked him how we can solve a problem caused by consumer spending by encouraging more consumer spending. It was an awkwardly worded question, and I think he meant "how can we solve a problem caused by consumer spending fueled by cheap debt and easy credit by providing more cheap debt and easy credit." Nevertheless, Pres. Obama's response was to tell him he was wrong, that the problem was caused by "bank leverage" and proceeded to ramble about nothing coherent for several minutes. It was painfully obvious to me at that time that Pres. Obama does not understand the economic crisis well enough to either explain the problem or lie convincingly about it.

Oscar's other criticisms are of course, dead on correct.
Click to expand...

What is your take on why the financial collapse happened?
Click to expand...

Easing restrictions on home mortgage loans and low interest rates. Housing bubble wouldn't have happened if banks didn't give money out to everybody that breathes air. Home values soared, people used homes as ATM machines to buy toys. That gave profits to companies and the DOW went to 14K. All it did was create a "fake" economy. After the 2001 crash, we should have never went to 14K DOW. We created a bubble within a much bigger bubble.
Click to expand...

If it didn't go to the housing market, it would have gone someplace. As long as the fed thinks it can control the economy through interest rate, the business cycle will be too extreme.
 
WINEX said:
BlackVault CM said:
Well I was going to just say "Greed" and "Corruption". But I didn't want to use those words.
Click to expand...

"Stupidity" and "arrogance" are suitable replacements.
Click to expand...

I prefer the phrase, "government intervention in the marketplace". But, that is synonomous with stupidity and arrogance.
 
green_cactus said:
skek said:
To oversimplify things, cheap debt and easy credit resulted in an epic bubble economy causing asset prices (notably residential RE, but not solely) to divorce themselves from fundamental values and fueling irresponsible consumer spending at the expense of savings and investment. That banks leveraged themselves was a symptom of the problem, not the cause -- they leveraged themselves because the cheap credit underpriced risk and the returns seemed "to good to be true." And to preempt your next question, lax regulation and greed certainly fueled the problem.

BTW, as I type this, Ron Paul is smacking Bernanke around in the House financial services committee meeting.
Click to expand...

Doesn't the leveraging of derivative products massively amplify the problem?
Click to expand...

Of course, but there has to be leverage before there is deleverage. And the leveraging is the result of fractional reserve banking and fiat currency. Fractional reserve banking, fiat currency, and a central bank is the problem, bottom line.
 
skek said:
green_cactus said:
skek said:
To oversimplify things, cheap debt and easy credit resulted in an epic bubble economy causing asset prices (notably residential RE, but not solely) to divorce themselves from fundamental values and fueling irresponsible consumer spending at the expense of savings and investment. That banks leveraged themselves was a symptom of the problem, not the cause -- they leveraged themselves because the cheap credit underpriced risk and the returns seemed "to good to be true." And to preempt your next question, lax regulation and greed certainly fueled the problem.

BTW, as I type this, Ron Paul is smacking Bernanke around in the House financial services committee meeting.
Click to expand...

Doesn't the leveraging of derivative products massively amplify the problem?
Click to expand...

Sure, but it's not the problem. The problem is what Chuck Todd implied it is, and what Obama admitted he wants more of. That will also amplify things.
Click to expand...

And why, no matter how well intentioned, the "stimulus" plan will make matters worse.
 
I'm thinking of purchasing a condo sometime before the end of 2009 and was looking into the details of the new tax credit. According to this faq (http://www.federalhousingtaxcredit.com/2009/faq.php) at the bottom it says you can actually claim the credit on your 08 tax return!

My issue is... I would receive a larger credit in 08 since I anticipate making more in 09 (I'm within the "phase-out" segment of eligibility.) So could I claim the credit on my 08 tax return prior to purchasing a condo with the intention of purchasing before the end of 2009?

Thanks.
 
For those keeping score at home:

Jobs created or saved by Obama's stimulus bill: California 31k, Colorado 396k

No wonder he signed it in Denver.

Anyone want to calculate the amount Californians will pay in taxes per job created or "saved" by the stimulus plan?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top