skek said:One alternative plan that would actually stimulate the economy:
Thune Introduces Middle Class Tax Relief Amendment to the Stimulus Bill
Middle Class Couples Would Receive up to $10,286
WASHINGTON, DC – Senator John Thune today introduced an across-the-board middle class tax rebate amendment (S. AMDT #538) to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009. Senator Thune’s amendment would strike the entire $936 billion Senate stimulus bill and replace it with a $936 billion across-the-board-middle-class tax rebate for 182 million Americans. The amendment would result in a tax rebate of $5,143 for single filers and $10,286 for married couples who file jointly. Eligibility is capped for all tax filers at 2007 adjusted gross income of $250,000.
“There seems to be a great deal of discussion over how to spend American taxpayers’ money and future earnings. Instead of investing billions in wasteful government programs that won't provide immediate help to our troubled economy, my amendment invests in the American people,” said Thune. “I think most Americans believe they know how to best spend their own money and would rather have control over it than have the government create new federal programs, or waste it on pet pork projects that will not stimulate the economy. My amendment is an equitable way to ensure that virtually all working Americans benefit from this economic stimulus plan. This is substantial tax relief for middle class families.
In 2007, roughly 53 million joint and 76 million single tax returns were filed with an adjusted gross income of less than $250,000.
“If people are serious about the need for this stimulus bill to be timely, the fastest way to inject money into our economy is through tax returns. We could have $936 billion into the economy by the end of the year. Taxpayers want help and they don’t want us wasting their hard-earned tax dollars on programs that won’t benefit anyone in the near future. This amendment addresses all of the nation’s leading economists who have said that any stimulus bill needs to be timely, targeted, and temporary.”
Senator Thune explained his amendment on the floor of the U.S. Senate today. Video of his floor speech can be viewed here. The Senate is expected to vote on Senator Thune’s amendment later this afternoon.
Oscar said:I'm watching the Obama press conference. It is ugly.
![]()
graphrix said:Is that a Turtle Ridge house in the background, or is it Quail Hill?
No_Such_Reality said:What was ugly? The hypocrisy? The pride in having a pork free bill and them bragging about the earmarks?
That was part of it. Other parts included that meandering answers that seemed to drift for minutes at a time while not actually answering anything, the blatant lies about the content and intentions of the bills coming from Congress, the ham-handed way he handled the Grande Dame of the Press Corps... Helen Thomas, the calls for an end to partisan bickering while indulging in partisanship by accusing the Republicans of being partisans, ad infinitum.No_Such_Reality said:What was ugly? The hypocrisy? The pride in having a pork free bill and them bragging about the earmarks?
graphrix said:No_Such_Reality said:What was ugly? The hypocrisy? The pride in having a pork free bill and them bragging about the earmarks?
The house is ugly. Just another Irvine stucco box.
Probably the most famous and well-publicized Worlds Ugliest Dog was the 2003-2005 winner Sam. Sam was a purebred hairless Chinese Crested owned by Susie Lockheed of Santa Barbara, CA. He was taken in initially as a temporary rescue and was considered un-adoptable by most standards due to his age, looks and temperment. However after several days in a cage and being somewhat re-socialized, Sam was released from his cage and became on of the pack of other hairless dogs that Susie Lockheed owned. Unfortunately, Sam was euthanized in November 2005 at nearly 15 years of age due to heart failure. Sam was unofficially dubbed as the “Ugliest Dog Ever”.
Lockheed said she initially was terrified of Sam when she agreed to take him in as a rescue dog six years ago on a 48-hour trial basis. Although she fell in love with him, his appearance repulsed her then-boyfriend and prompted the man to break up with her.
skek said:Forgive me for getting the name wrong, but I think it was Chuck Todd who asked him how we can solve a problem caused by consumer spending by encouraging more consumer spending. It was an awkwardly worded question, and I think he meant "how can we solve a problem caused by consumer spending fueled by cheap debt and easy credit by providing more cheap debt and easy credit." Nevertheless, Pres. Obama's response was to tell him he was wrong, that the problem was caused by "bank leverage" and proceeded to ramble about nothing coherent for several minutes. It was painfully obvious to me at that time that Pres. Obama does not understand the economic crisis well enough to either explain the problem or lie convincingly about it.
Oscar's other criticisms are of course, dead on correct.
skek said:Forgive me for getting the name wrong, but I think it was Chuck Todd who asked him how we can solve a problem caused by consumer spending by encouraging more consumer spending. It was an awkwardly worded question, and I think he meant "how can we solve a problem caused by consumer spending fueled by cheap debt and easy credit by providing more cheap debt and easy credit." Nevertheless, Pres. Obama's response was to tell him he was wrong, that the problem was caused by "bank leverage" and proceeded to ramble about nothing coherent for several minutes. It was painfully obvious to me at that time that Pres. Obama does not understand the economic crisis well enough to either explain the problem or lie convincingly about it.
Oscar's other criticisms are of course, dead on correct.
green_cactus said:skek said:Forgive me for getting the name wrong, but I think it was Chuck Todd who asked him how we can solve a problem caused by consumer spending by encouraging more consumer spending. It was an awkwardly worded question, and I think he meant "how can we solve a problem caused by consumer spending fueled by cheap debt and easy credit by providing more cheap debt and easy credit." Nevertheless, Pres. Obama's response was to tell him he was wrong, that the problem was caused by "bank leverage" and proceeded to ramble about nothing coherent for several minutes. It was painfully obvious to me at that time that Pres. Obama does not understand the economic crisis well enough to either explain the problem or lie convincingly about it.
Oscar's other criticisms are of course, dead on correct.
What is your take on why the financial collapse happened?
BlackVault CM said:green_cactus said:skek said:Forgive me for getting the name wrong, but I think it was Chuck Todd who asked him how we can solve a problem caused by consumer spending by encouraging more consumer spending. It was an awkwardly worded question, and I think he meant "how can we solve a problem caused by consumer spending fueled by cheap debt and easy credit by providing more cheap debt and easy credit." Nevertheless, Pres. Obama's response was to tell him he was wrong, that the problem was caused by "bank leverage" and proceeded to ramble about nothing coherent for several minutes. It was painfully obvious to me at that time that Pres. Obama does not understand the economic crisis well enough to either explain the problem or lie convincingly about it.
Oscar's other criticisms are of course, dead on correct.
What is your take on why the financial collapse happened?
Easing restrictions on home mortgage loans. That is what created this whole mess.