Author Topic: [IHB] A Review of the San Mateo Tract at Stonegate  (Read 6862 times)

Offline The California Court Company

  • What's this?
  • Certified Irvine Addict
  • ****
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 381
  • -Received: 332
  • Posts: 1816
Re: [IHB] A Review of the San Mateo Tract at Stonegate
« on: February 22, 2012, 07:28:28 PM »
Any one has opinions about the san mateo plan 3 vs. san macro plan 1? which one is better?
I think San macro has a better layout of the first floor. But it is not an end unit.
I am not sure if it worth the the extra $30000.

San Marcos Plan 1:
Plus
walk-in pantry
2 walls for the great room
tech space on 2nd floor

Minus
in the middle
$30k more

I'd choose San Mateo plan 3 over San Marcos plan 1:
1. $30k cheaper; I just cannot pay above $600k for homes without a drive way or zoned as condo.
2. end unit is much more favorable, especially for motor court homes. End unit close to the street is better than the one tucked inside.
3. lack of tech space and pantry, and different great room layout can be managed.
4. Overall location San Mateo > San Marcos, which is closer to Sand Canyon, designated commercial truck route including garbage trucks.
"Should any Person come into contact with such fruit, soil or groundwater, such Person is advised to wash thoroughly with soap and water and seek immediate medical attention"-Augusta Disclosure, Tustin Legacy

"You'll probably be able to buy a 4BR detached home in Quail Hill for $150,000."-IndieDev

The following member(s) thanked this post:



Talk Irvine Links

[Recent Posts]
[FAQ / Rules]

Site Supporters


SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2021, SimplePortal