No, that was Danimal math there. Kumon could help with that.Sorry i used LL math. It should be 1.1k instead of 1.1 m
1 house for 1,000 people whether they can afford at high interest rate is super tight on the supply side.
you're right but that wasn't my point. point is there will always be more people than homes. even with the 2008 recession, inventory nationwide rose to 3m? It's now 1m I think? So using number of individuals in an area to show if there exists demand or not is not a good representation of market demand.Considering you have less than 3,000 homes even if 1/2% of those people are buyers in the market there's still more buyers than homes available.
you're right but that wasn't my point. point is there will always be more people than homes. even with the 2008 recession, inventory nationwide rose to 3m? It's now 1m I think? So using number of individuals in an area to show if there exists demand or not is not a good representation of market demand.
No, that was Danimal math there. Kumon could help with that.
Your larger point is also pretty weak because raw population numbers don't say anything about the number of people shopping for homes.
The median price in OC is $1.2M and that really just gets you a basic 1,200-1,400 sq ft home. With a 20% down payment, the PITIA is still between $7,500-$8,000.
So you need a household income of at least $250k to buy this humble home. A $250k income puts you in the 95th percentile which means only the top 5% of households in OC can afford the median-priced small home.
View attachment 9745
If each household has 3 people that means just over 1M households, and if only 5% of households can afford to buy.... that only leaves 52,000 potential buyers for the median-priced home.
If no more than 4-5% of these people are searching for homes, then there is plenty of inventory at today's prices. If job losses lead to a spike in inventory, or higher prices/rates lead to less qualified buyers, then there will be a situation where we have too much inventory and sellers will either need to lower prices or pull their homes from the market.
The all cash buyers are a valid thing to pay attention to, but they aren't what has driven the market historically, even for Irvine. In fact, Irvine has shown itself to be more sensitive to rates than other areas. The Irvine price declines in 2013-14, 2018-19, and 2022 all coincided with rapid spikes in interest rates. Maybe this time is different.Yet over 50% of homes in Irvine today are purchased for all cash. Your bar chart means very little today unfortunately. Also, not all financed buyers are only putting 20% down.
LL correlation equals causation rule in full effect!The all cash buyers are a valid thing to pay attention to, but they aren't what has driven the market historically, even for Irvine. In fact, Irvine has shown itself to be more sensitive to rates than other areas. The Irvine price declines in 2013-14, 2018-19, and 2022 all coincided with rapid spikes in interest rates. Maybe this time is different.
The all cash buyers are a valid thing to pay attention to, but they aren't what has driven the market historically, even for Irvine. In fact, Irvine has shown itself to be more sensitive to rates than other areas. The Irvine price declines in 2013-14, 2018-19, and 2022 all coincided with rapid spikes in interest rates. Maybe this time is different.
What does this mean? Can you explain like I'm 5?As a note, VA and FHA loans have significant value to lenders, almost 3x the income of a conventional loan. Wells and loanDepot recently refocused some of their lending priorities on these loans.... for Borrowers who have little or no chance of seeing an offer being accepted in this present market. I take it as a sign of desperation for these (and many other) lenders.
By 'refocus' do you mean they lowered minimum credit scores and other qualifying criteria?Even areas outside of Irvine are dominated by cash buyers according to the Realtors I've spoken with lately. Investor buys come in second, with financed pulling up in third place.
As a note, VA and FHA loans have significant value to lenders, almost 3x the income of a conventional loan. Wells and loanDepot recently refocused some of their lending priorities on these loans.... for Borrowers who have little or no chance of seeing an offer being accepted in this present market. I take it as a sign of desperation for these (and many other) lenders.
In some ways. Wells for many years said they would fund FHA and VA loans at a 620 FICO minimum. In early 2023 that dropped to 580. (Not sure where they are today) loanDepot has always done FHA/VA loans with low FICO scores so why advertise your specialized training and concierge service for these loans?By 'refocus' do you mean they lowered minimum credit scores and other qualifying criteria?
Government insured loans (FHA/VA) are essentially risk free to the lenders who write them. They are more valuable to investors and servicing companies who will pay a larger premium for this level of security of return. A bank might find 5k in value on a $100k conventional loan, but $15k or more in value for an FHA or VA loan.
Assume you want to sell your home, listed at $1m. You get 3 offers.
Offer 1 is $990k all cash, close in 48hrs. The buyer will give you a 30 day rent back at no cost.
Offer 2 is, $1M conventional financed 10% down, close in 15 days, appraisal and inspection are waived.
Offer 3 is $1.050, FHA or VA, 20% down close in 30 days.
The vast majority of sellers will take the path of least resistance - all cash or conventionally financed, rather than the FHA/VA.
Why? Well, let's first shoot the elephant in the room: the listing agent is probably a moron. They think an appraisal and inspection will come in low or ask for costly repairs, that end up being a $20-$25k concession that lowers the net to you. The realtor also has never closed an FHA/VA transaction before and has accepted other moron realtors whisperings about how FHA and VA deals are "costly" and "don't close." Finally, who doesn't want their cash in a hurry? Fast closes can be done in all 3 scenarios, but financed transactions still need a minimum of 1 week to close. The bottom line: All of this hoo-ha about FHA/VA loans being trouble are pure fiction. That said, a buyer should consider this fact: Perception IS reality so you will need to plan accordingly.
There are a precious few Realtors and Sellers who will take a good hard look at accepting an FHA/VA deal, but once counter offers are sent out both All Cash and Conventional buyers will often "over-sweeten" their terms beyond what an FHA/VA buyer can.
As it's been said by others "...Follow the money..." Why ramp up FHA/VA lending when LA/OC buyers have a statistically demonstrated .05% chance of having their offer accepted? It's not to show their benevolence, but as I believe, to grab cash, of which they are starving of, any way they can.
PS: Offers 1, 2, and 3 are roughly the same net to seller, give or take a very few thousands of dollars. Offer 2 and 3 may have appraisal issues, and both will still do inspections. Even though some buyers waive inspections, I've seen sellers still concede $$$ for repairs - merely "go away" money so the closing can occur.
The only way forward is the quality of your Realtor. A strong, well connected Realtor through the crafting of a solid offer, one who pre-resolves stumbling blocks with the listing agent prior to your offer being submitted, can often get an FHA/VA, even a Bond Loan purchase accepted by a seller. It's all in the preparation, which few realtors know how to do.But what does this all mean for buyers who are planning to use one of these loan types in the near future? That it will be easier to get these loan offers accepted because the companies are going to provide educational outreach on how "strong" these products are? Or what?
Exactly. It sucks. New construction is pretty much the only option with these types of loans in Irvine, and new construction home prices are absolutely absurd at this point.The sad truth is that in Irvine I can count the number of FHA and VA buyers in a month on one hand.