irvinehomeowner said:
eyephone said:
irvinehomeowner said:
eyephone said:
All this solar talk is making me think about getting solar.
This is not the solar you are looking for.
If I can get my bill any lower, the better.
Your bill may be lower, but your total cost outlay won't be depending on buy vs lease, length of ownership, power consumption, etc etc.
I think it makes sense if you are getting it at a large discount by the builder... but after market seems like hit and miss.
Agreed. I couldn't believe how much of a discount we got from the Builder. I was skeptical (and still a little). But the price was 1/3 of the retail price.
They "guarantee" a certain production. If they don't meet it, then they pay you. Of course, it is literally pennies per KW. So, from their business standpoint, it may make more sense to just pay you off for low production than maintain the units. I guess time will tell. Best case, if the cells produce what they should, then it will pay off in as little as 4 years. Worst case, if they don't produce anything and Solar City doesn't fix/maintain then it will take 33 years to pay off. I think that there would be other legal ramifications though in that worst case.
The price was so low, I had to give it a shot. However, I may be nervous about buying retail. Anyone buying a new home should review closely