adventurous
New member
City Council votes 3-2 to push back the vote by two weeks in order to fully analyze the Five Points offer. I think it's the right move. It would be even better if the offer is rejected. Five Points offers a golf course and over 20 ball fields in the Great Park under a private management. Well, I don't see why we need the fifth (!) golf course in the city. 20+ ball fields instead of a family park is a bit overkill too.
What do you think? Do we need to build a cheap sports park or keep developing the Great Park, acre by acre? In any way, the it's going to come at the cost of extra residential construction around the Great Park, than initially anticipated. So, my question is how to use it wisely, so it will benefit the city and the residents in the best possible way.
What do you think? Do we need to build a cheap sports park or keep developing the Great Park, acre by acre? In any way, the it's going to come at the cost of extra residential construction around the Great Park, than initially anticipated. So, my question is how to use it wisely, so it will benefit the city and the residents in the best possible way.