Getting 2nd FHA Loan as Spouse's Primary Residence

dream16

New member
Guys, did anyone here was successfully able to get a 2nd FHA mortgage on their spouse name (in another state) while their primary residence (only on 1 person name) has been rented out and has an existing ongoing FHA loan.

What are typical requirements to get his loan?

Example: Husband owns a primary residence property in CA and rented it out and now lives in CT. Husband wants to buy a second primary residence property for wife in TX (only her name on title). IF the wife does not have a job, would lender allow that? Also, would wife have to fulfill the condition of living in the TX property once/week?


Someone in 2012 provided the following HUD guidelines:
https://www.trulia.com/voices/Home_Buying/Can_wife_purchase_a_home_w_FHA_loan_if_husband_al-400883

FHA loan requires the property to be owner-occupied. Do you have an FHA loan on your mortgage?

This is straight from the HUD website. Hope this helps. Let me know if you need more details.

Can a person have more than one FHA loan?

To prevent circumvention of the restrictions on FHA-insured mortgages to investors, FHA generally will not insure more than one mortgage for any borrower (transactions in which an existing FHA mortgage is paid off and another FHA mortgage is acquired are acceptable). Any person individually or jointly owning a home covered by a mortgage insured by FHA in which ownership is maintained may not purchase another principal residence with FHA mortgage insurance except under the situations described below. Properties previously acquired as investment properties are not subject to these restrictions.

FHA will not insure a mortgage if FHA concludes that the transaction was designed to use FHA mortgage insurance as a vehicle for obtaining investment properties, even if the property to be encumbered will be the only one owned using FHA mortgage insurance.

We do not object to homebuyers using FHA mortgage insurance more than once if compatible with the homebuyer's needs and resources as follows:

A. Relocations. If the borrower is relocating and re-establishing residency in another area not within reasonable commuting distance from the current principal residence, the borrower may obtain another mortgage using FHA insured financing and is not required to sell the existing property covered by a FHA-insured mortgage. The relocation need not be employer mandated to qualify for this exception. Further, if the borrower returns to an area where he or she owns a property with an FHA-insured mortgage, it is not required that the borrower re-establish primary residency in that property in order to be eligible for another FHA insured mortgage.

B. Increase in Family Size. The borrower may be permitted to obtain another home with an FHA-insured mortgage if the number of legal dependents increases to the point that the present house no longer meets the family's needs. The borrower must provide satisfactory evidence of the increase in dependents and the property's failure to meet the family's needs. The borrower also must pay down the outstanding FHA mortgage (secondary liens do not need to be paid off or paid down) on the present property to a 75 percent or lower loan-to-value (LTV) ratio. A current residential appraisal must be used to determine LTV compliance. Tax assessments, market analyses by real estate brokers, etc., are not acceptable as proof of LTV compliance.

C. Vacating a Jointly Owned Property. If the borrower is vacating a residence that will remain occupied by a co-borrower, the borrower is permitted to obtain another FHA-insured mortgage. Acceptable situations include instances of divorce, after which the vacating ex-spouse will purchase a new home, or one of the co-borrowers will vacate the existing property.

D. Non-Occupying Co-Borrower. A non-occupying co-borrower on property being purchased with an FHA-insured mortgage as a principal residence by other family members may have a joint interest in that property as well as in a principal residence of their own with a FHA-insured mortgage. (See HUD Handbook 4155.1 for additional information). Under no circumstances may investors use the exceptions described above to circumvent FHA's ban on loans to private investors and acquire rental properties through purportedly purchasing "principal residences".

Considerations in determining the eligibility of a borrower for one of these exceptions are the length of time the previous property was owned by the borrower and the circumstances that compel the borrower to purchase another residence with an FHA-insured mortgage. In all other cases, the purchasing borrower either must pay off the FHA-insured mortgage on the previous residence or terminate ownership of that property before acquiring another FHA-insured mortgage.

Handbook 4155.1: 4.B.2.c-d
 
Need to ask someone who has funded a loan in Texas, and in that case it's got to be someone who lives in Texas as well.

3.5% down is X to close, but the monthly payment costs are very high. Not clear why a 5% down conventional, just 1.5% more, isn't the smarter way to go. Sure the rate may be higher, but the PMI is lower and the hoops are much easier to jump through.

My .02c
 
Back
Top