I've converted another to Team FCB.freedomcm said:Everyone who owns in Irvine is drowning in foreign money and pay cash for their houses!
freedomcm said:Why did you post this in the irvine real estate section?
We all know that foreclosures only happen in the other bad parts of TheOC, not Irvine!
Everyone who owns in Irvine is drowning in foreign money and pay cash for their houses!
freedomcm said:Why did you post this in the irvine real estate section?
We all know that foreclosures only happen in the other bad parts of TheOC, not Irvine!
Everyone who owns in Irvine is drowning in foreign money and pay cash for their houses!
Talyssa said:freedomcm said:Why did you post this in the irvine real estate section?
We all know that foreclosures only happen in the other bad parts of TheOC, not Irvine!
Everyone who owns in Irvine is drowning in foreign money and pay cash for their houses!
I think a lot of only LOOSELY related stuff gets posted in the Irvine board becuase that's the most active one..... vicious cycle. I saw this article in my RSS feed too (on the NYT) and I honestly don't think it matters much. All it does is say "we are still at the same place that we were before!" -- I mean yeah if hte moratorium had lasted a long time then that might have changed things, but since it isn't going to it shouldn't have any real effect. I dunno. We'll see. Maybe.
I have no idea what the state of the market is . I know LOTS of people who bought during the peak, and can afford their homes although they are unhappy with how much they paid. And yet, things still seem kind of expensive to me. Maybe not totally and completely unaffordable, but high. It seems like a financially responsible person making a little over a starting salary (say 45k, they started at 36k and have been working 3-4 years - common numbers among people I know) should be able to buy a starter condo, and I still don't feel like that is the case. Then again, I don't spend a lot of time looking at fullerton and placentia and such, maybe thats where the affordability is. Then again, I guess things are affordable if you're willing to go up to that 33% of your income on housing number. we don't feel very comfortable going much above 20.
20% of ur income, it's a dream come true. it may happen but not in cities like NP,LB,Irvine..... during boom time, people were going for 50%. it's going down but then all these cash buyers are just buying any reasonable priced property in a matter of days. I am watching NWII and most of the houses r in pending status and that too with 1-2 weeks of listing. u have to really wait a lot to get to 20% until unless u r ready to move to surrounding cities like fullerton, orange, riverside etc....acf said:If you're looking for a house, I think it's a waiting game right now. Maybe it will pay off, maybe it wont...
Talyssa said:freedomcm said:Why did you post this in the irvine real estate section?
We all know that foreclosures only happen in the other bad parts of TheOC, not Irvine!
Everyone who owns in Irvine is drowning in foreign money and pay cash for their houses!
I think a lot of only LOOSELY related stuff gets posted in the Irvine board becuase that's the most active one..... vicious cycle. I saw this article in my RSS feed too (on the NYT) and I honestly don't think it matters much. All it does is say "we are still at the same place that we were before!" -- I mean yeah if hte moratorium had lasted a long time then that might have changed things, but since it isn't going to it shouldn't have any real effect. I dunno. We'll see. Maybe.
I have no idea what the state of the market is . I know LOTS of people who bought during the peak, and can afford their homes although they are unhappy with how much they paid. And yet, things still seem kind of expensive to me. Maybe not totally and completely unaffordable, but high. It seems like a financially responsible person making a little over a starting salary (say 45k, they started at 36k and have been working 3-4 years - common numbers among people I know) should be able to buy a starter condo, and I still don't feel like that is the case. Then again, I don't spend a lot of time looking at fullerton and placentia and such, maybe thats where the affordability is. Then again, I guess things are affordable if you're willing to go up to that 33% of your income on housing number. we don't feel very comfortable going much above 20.
Talyssa said:freedomcm said:Why did you post this in the irvine real estate section?
We all know that foreclosures only happen in the other bad parts of TheOC, not Irvine!
Everyone who owns in Irvine is drowning in foreign money and pay cash for their houses!
I think a lot of only LOOSELY related stuff gets posted in the Irvine board becuase that's the most active one..... vicious cycle. I saw this article in my RSS feed too (on the NYT) and I honestly don't think it matters much. All it does is say "we are still at the same place that we were before!" -- I mean yeah if hte moratorium had lasted a long time then that might have changed things, but since it isn't going to it shouldn't have any real effect. I dunno. We'll see. Maybe.
I have no idea what the state of the market is . I know LOTS of people who bought during the peak, and can afford their homes although they are unhappy with how much they paid. And yet, things still seem kind of expensive to me. Maybe not totally and completely unaffordable, but high. It seems like a financially responsible person making a little over a starting salary (say 45k, they started at 36k and have been working 3-4 years - common numbers among people I know) should be able to buy a starter condo, and I still don't feel like that is the case. Then again, I don't spend a lot of time looking at fullerton and placentia and such, maybe thats where the affordability is. Then again, I guess things are affordable if you're willing to go up to that 33% of your income on housing number. we don't feel very comfortable going much above 20.
Talyssa said:Easier than quoting people...
iac - although it still FEELS expensive to me, I am not sure thats the same as BEING expensive. Right now, I feel that Irvine is priced ok. in terms of what the market will bear. Sure there are lots of people who want to buy there if only prices were 100k less, but people seem to be going ahead and buying anyway -- and a lot of them just choose to settle on whatever their lower priority is. So I know two people who desperately absolutely could not live without being in Irvine and ended up buying either a smaller property or one of those detached condos rather than give up Irvine. I know other people who bought in Aliso, Lake Forest, and Ladera Ranch because they wanted newer homes and the south county feel but couldn't afford a property of hte same caliber in Irvine or maybe not in a part of Irvine they liked. I hope prices DO drop so that those of you who have your heart set on certain types of properties in Irvine can buy what they want, but I think you should revisit your priority list, because as far as I can see, prices don't NEED to drop anymore. Maybe I am wrong, I don't look at the irvine market as much as some do. But people seem to be able to buy there with small sacrifices - either sacrificing money and paying more, sacrificing a particular neighborhood, or an extra bedroom, or SFR status, or a slightly larger lot, whatever. And no house will ever be perfectly what you want at the price you want it - just like you can make a list of the traits your future life partner will have but it goes out the window when you actually pick that person out.
If you hate being hot, buy close to the beach....Huntington Beach, Costa Mesa, and Laguna Niguel might be good options for you. Irvine is at least 5+ degrees warmer than those cities.Talyssa said:Oh HELLS yeah its better than Corona, its freaking hot in Corona and the traffic is atrocious. If I had to choose between only corona and Irvine I'd live in a shack in Irvine. I HATE being hot. The real question is whether the premium in Irvine is worth living there instead of in a nice neighborhood in central/coastal OC that isn't in Irvine. Or if you prefer a larger selection of newer homes, there's aliso, lake forest, etc.
I really don't like comparisons to Irvine vs Riverside/Corona -- actually I mean I think they're ok, but its good to be clear that you aren't really comparing the CITIES, you're comparing the type of homes more than the cities. Irvine as a location beats the hell out of riverside and corona, but I have know many people in my life that absolutely positively cannot live in a home that is not brand new, and a few others that refuse to live in a home more than a couple years old (the style and architecture of homes built around the same time tends to be similar) If that is a major factor for you,then riverside/corona are just as good as irvine and cost a whole lot less.
USCTrojanCPA said:If you hate being hot, buy close to the beach....Huntington Beach, Costa Mesa, and Laguna Niguel might be good options for you. Irvine is at least 5+ degrees warmer than those cities.
Irvine2Irvine said:USCTrojanCPA said:If you hate being hot, buy close to the beach....Huntington Beach, Costa Mesa, and Laguna Niguel might be good options for you. Irvine is at least 5+ degrees warmer than those cities.
I live in Irvine and work in Huntington Beach. It can be up to 20 degree difference at the worst case during the dog days of summer. Usually, it's about 10-15 degree difference during the summer. That's a huge difference. I have friends who remodeled their house in HB and go all out with top of the line everything, but don't get central air. You can't beat the weather in HB. That's probably why HB home prices are higher than Irvine per sq ft.