http://www.ocregister.com/2017/11/0...vines-decision-on-veterans-cemetery-location/
The outcome would impact all of us, swap or not.
The outcome would impact all of us, swap or not.
jmoney74 said:The petitioners mostly told people that it was to save the cemetery. That's how they got all those signatures.
Burn That Belly said:Isn't that the whole point of the Great Park? To bring people together with sports parks, base camp food halls, trails, parks, skating rinks, and finally top it off with a memorial site to pay your respects to our finest. Get everything done in one location.
Burn That Belly said:eatthis said:Burn That Belly said:Isn't that the whole point of the Great Park? To bring people together with sports parks, base camp food halls, trails, parks, skating rinks, and finally top it off with a memorial site to pay your respects to our finest. Get everything done in one location.
What?s the point of this post? Both sites were part of the El Toro marine base. Its ridiculous to shove a site that requires millions of dollars to cleanup and veteran don?t want and call it saving the cemetery. It?s false advertising at its worst.
Listen. The counter-protesting petition called the original site a "blighted land" and the one at the freeway "strawberry" fields. Do you not think that statement is also misleading AF ???
How dare they call that site blighted land. What about Portola High and other homes built on GP. Are those not "blighted" land?
I can see why 5P doesn't want the cemetery at the existing location, but why would TIC want it with PS so close?jmoney74 said:The petitioners mostly told people that it was to save the cemetery. That's how they got all those signatures.
It's really TIC vs 5 points at this point.
Happiness said:I can see why 5P doesn't want the cemetery at the existing location, but why would TIC want it with PS so close?jmoney74 said:The petitioners mostly told people that it was to save the cemetery. That's how they got all those signatures.
It's really TIC vs 5 points at this point.
Happiness said:I can see why 5P doesn't want the cemetery at the existing location, but why would TIC want it with PS so close?jmoney74 said:The petitioners mostly told people that it was to save the cemetery. That's how they got all those signatures.
It's really TIC vs 5 points at this point.
zubs said:It's ok guys...after this vote, there will be another petition to put it back to the strawberry fields...and it will go on and on forever..
This cemetery will never be built and will provide years and years of comedy for our benefit!
irvine buyer said:As an aside, if you've traveled that stretch of Irvine Blvd. lately you'll notice the increased traffic especially during commuting hours. The last thing anyone wants is to have funeral processions further aggrevating traffic. Disclaimer: I don't live close enough for the cemetery to affect my property values so that is not the basis for my position.