YellowFever
New member
.
.
- Thread starter YellowFever
- Start date
irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
Where is the railroad in Oak Creek, Westpark and Woodbridge?
Laguna Altura is exposed to freeway.
Laguna Altura is exposed to freeway.
usctrojancpa
Well-known member
YellowFever said:USCTrojanCPA said:Hey YellowFever, any hazards that I should be aware of in Tustin Ranch (north of Irvine Blvd)?
Is that a rhetorical question??
I didn't see your chart until now. Btw, I bought last April before your chart. What about the planes that sometimes fly to the East of Tustin Ranch? One of the main reasons why I bought in Tustin Ranch because it had the 3-car garage single-story unicorn home that I was looking for.
YellowFever
New member
.
irvinehomeshopper
Well-known member
No wonder the rich folks in Newport Beach are getting cancers living directly below the take off flight path.
mitirvine31
New member
unless you buy in OH, hidden canyon, ew, you gonna get CANCER.
Stop it already.. people are living for decades in Irvine communities..
people who buy in Irvine wants to live happily and enjoy city for the price they are paying. Not to die, with the stress of thinking about cancer or other environmental hazards.
Stop it already.. people are living for decades in Irvine communities..
people who buy in Irvine wants to live happily and enjoy city for the price they are paying. Not to die, with the stress of thinking about cancer or other environmental hazards.
YellowFever
New member
.
http://www.talkirvine.com/index.php/topic,15273.msg308049.html#msg308049mitirvine31 said:
Irvine is fine, this yellow jizz hazard sheet is highly subjective (and he mentions it couple times).
If you want a more comprehensive report, zoom in on Irvine here:https://oehha.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=4560cfbce7c745c299b2d0cbb07044f5
and here's their supporting methodology:https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/calenviroscreen/report/042313calenviroscreen1.pdf
On the map, you can click on areas within Irvine with stats such as these instead of coyotes or potential cemetery:
Pollution Burden Percentile
Population Characteristics Percentile
Ozone
PM 2.5
Diesel
Pesticides
Toxic Releases
Traffic
Drinking Water
Cleanups
Groundwater Threats
Hazardous Waste
Impaired Water
Solid Waste
Asthma
Low Birth Weight
Cardiovascular Rate
Education
Linguistic Isolation
Poverty
Unemployment
Housing Burden
Doesn't have GP since it's new, but I don't think it'll be deep red like you see in IE or inner LA
YellowFever
New member
.
OCLuvr
Active member
Dude,
You have to own up your chart, as you point every prospective home buyer to take a look at it. When you start getting cornered, you can't say " it is for entertainment purposes ". People, mostly salaried folks, are investing their hard earned money while buying --no entertainment involved.
You have to own up your chart, as you point every prospective home buyer to take a look at it. When you start getting cornered, you can't say " it is for entertainment purposes ". People, mostly salaried folks, are investing their hard earned money while buying --no entertainment involved.
YellowFever
New member
.
irvinehomeowner
Well-known member
AW said:
Heh... Westpark and Woodbridge are just as green as Turtle Rock and Hidden Canyon.
But I think some of the Great Park hoods are going to be orange because they were former Marine base and agricultural land.
OC troll
New member
YellowFever said:irvinehomeowner said:YellowFever said:
Because you're so over the top about hazard exposure and most work places have high exposure to radiation/electricity/etc (computers everywhere) so why aren't you worried about that?
Just using a computer to work on your spreadsheet probably took 6 months off your lifespan.
Just sayin'.
Well, as I mentioned before, if I am going to die because of a certain risk or hazard, then I want all my family, friends, coworkers, dog, cat, etc. to get exposed to it equally so I would feel happy about it.
The problem I have is if I get cancer/die simply because I was exposed to a particular hazard that nobody else, not my coworker, friends, family, dog, cat were exposed to and that hazard accelerated my demise. And if the only action I would have taken to not get cancer was to simply avoid it, then I would feel so sad and pissed and angry at myself for letting only myself become exposed to that. Does this make sense?
We are all exposed to electronics so in the case of y=mx+b (the b-intercept for electronics) is equal for mostly everyone and just shifts the curve up. The problem is when you introduce more hazards than your peers. Then the curve is no longer y=mx+b. The 'm' slope starts to get steeper than your peers.
80% of my friends and family don't live in Irvine. So they are not subjected to TCE and landfill. They are probably subjected to other stuff that are probably LESS harmful than TCE and landfill. So we're talking about 'acceleration' rate here.
I want to have the SAME EXACT or BETTER(lower) acceleration rate of cancer as my friends, family, peers, coworkers, etc. Certain hazards have significantly higher accelerated cancer development than others. We already know pesticides were responsible for childhood cancers/tumors in Quail Hill. It accelerated the odds by so much the kids didn't even need to wait until their adult years to develop the cancer versus the kid who sleeps with a cellphone underneath a pillow (radiation). That's my point.
@ YellowFever - all this cancer talk is scary, then I come across this article today
http://www.ocregister.com/2017/04/11/former-irvine-high-varsity-football-player-austin-hwang-diagnosed-with-terminal-cancer/
YellowFever
New member
.
OC troll
New member
YellowFever said:
Here's another one.
http://ktla.com/2017/01/04/10-year-old-irvine-girl-fights-for-her-life-after-being-diagnosed-with-cancer/
YellowFever
New member
.