Timeline shows Bush, McCain warning Dems of financial mess

IrvineRenter_IHB

New member
<object width="325" height="250"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/youtube" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="325" height="250"></embed></object>



I received an email from a very conservative relative of mine today. It is old. I believe pre-election. It is a wonderful example of bullshit historical revisionism and political spin perpetrated by Fox News.



First, let me say that neither the Democrats or the Republicans were largely responsible for the financial crisis and the housing bubble. There are a lot of culprits, Alan Greenspan being foremost among them, that are responsible for this problem, but blaming our either of the political parties is giving them too much responsibility for this mess.



However, since the Republicans were in charge, and since their grip on power was particularly strong from 2002-2006 when the bubble was inflating the most, there were very worried about being blamed for these problems in the 2008 elections (they were blamed, and it is one of the reasons they lost so many seats). They launched a preemptive attack on the Democrats and tried furiously to spin the issue as something the Democrats were responsible for, as if the powerless minority was in a position to create this problem. It takes a lot of nerve to put such a bold-faced lie out there, but they did, and it may have helped limit some of the political damage.



This video shows Barney Frank saying some really stupid things about the GSEs. Barney Frank is an idiot, and it frightens me that he has so much power. He will screw things up over the next several years. However, this video portrays him as someone who had power to impact legislation. From 1994-2006, he had none. While the Republicans held the house, Barney Frank had no power at all. He could talk all he wanted, but nobody was listening, and his vote did not matter. To portray him as having power over legislation during this time period is complete bullshit. He had none.



For the arguments in this video to make any sense, one has to believe Barney Frank and other Democrats had political power from 2002-2006. They did not. The only power the Democrats had during this time period was in the Senate, and that was through the filibuster. This is not a position to do much to influence legislation (as the Republicans are about to find out).



Of all the political memes during the 2008 election, I found this one the most amusing because it was so obviously wrong that only a die-hard partisan could possibly believe it. This kind of politicking is effective because it confuses the ignorant masses in the middle and it helps deflect blame from the party most likely to be held responsible.



It is brilliant political theater, and total nonsense.
 
I thought poor minorities and the CRA caused it all ...



In all seriousness, I recommend visiting <a href="http:// http://www.ritholtz.com">The Big Picture</a> on a regular basis.
 
[quote author="awgee" date=1231639151]I blame Woodrow Wilson more than anybody. Seriously.</blockquote>


Awgee



You hit the nail on the head.

Most people are not familiar with the Federal Reserve.

Its as much a government entity as Federal Express is.

And now look at the mess we are in.



This series is a little fringe. But the first couple parts are good.





<object width="325" height="250"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/youtube" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="325" height="250"></embed></object>







<object width="325" height="250"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/youtube" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="325" height="250"></embed></object>
 
The Democrats were not powerless in the Congress prior to 2006. They had far more power, as the minority, to affect legislation via procedural actions and motions than the Republicans do now. But trying to assign blame to either side is useless; both parties were more than happy to take credit for higher rates of homeownership and rising home values.



That being said, clowns like Barney Frank have been in charge for long enough to have made a difference, and now control all sides of the decision-making process. I expect that they will take all credit for any success and blame Bush for any failures... long after he has left power. The Republicans can no longer muster the kind of resistance that initially prevent the TARP from passing so any result, good or bad, will be laid at the feet of the Democrats. Sadly, the 2010 congressional campaigns start on January 20th.
 
IR,



Senate rules allow individual members to put a "hold" om legislation, and prevent it from coming to the floor for a vote. The Senate can over rule that "hold" with 60 votes. By the way, this arcane rule was the subject of the little kerfluffle between Reid and Coburn over the omnibus ("Coburn-bus") that was voted on yesterday.



Typically, before a vote is scheduled, the party whips will see where the votes are. If there are not 60 votes, then they won't even schedule the vote.



During the entirety of the Bush administration, the Democrats always had 40 votes in the Senate, so they could block any legislation from coming to the floor - and any legilation that would limit access to lending by minorities (and any restrictions on lending would disprportionally - by percentage - affect minorities) were hot button issues - Democrats traditionally do not win unless there is a large minority turnout.



In 2001 and 2005, the Democrats blocked reform of Fannie and Freddie using these procedures. They also did it to Clinton when he requested changes.
 
Back
Top