It's a lot of lost income when the rental sits for months at a time.No_Such_Reality said:The competition isn't there anymore either. During the bubble, rentals were steadily removed from the pool for sale and rentals that were listed didn't last. I now see rental signs staying up longer and longer which is what will give people a chance to see available rents again.
It's a very different discussion between landlord and tenant when the tenants sees rentals disappear in a week or less and when the tenant sees rental signs for a month or more on the street.
CalGal said:It's a lot of lost income when the rental sits for months at a time.No_Such_Reality said:The competition isn't there anymore either. During the bubble, rentals were steadily removed from the pool for sale and rentals that were listed didn't last. I now see rental signs staying up longer and longer which is what will give people a chance to see available rents again.
It's a very different discussion between landlord and tenant when the tenants sees rentals disappear in a week or less and when the tenant sees rental signs for a month or more on the street.
GoIllini said:Until last April, I was living in a private party 2 bedroom rental in University Park that was $2,000/month. The landlord sent me a notice of a rent increase and said his R/E agent had told him rents were increasing. No negotiation possible, even though I sent him several comps at lower prices. That, combined with the overall disrepair of the unit, the ancient, avocado green oven (circa 1970) and the noisy college-student neighbors, helped me decide to move to a better place. A bit more rent, but space for a second car in the garage (or, in my case, lots of stuff) and an extra bedroom. Nice and quiet, too. Since I am still in the same neighborhood, I drove past the old place once in a while to observe the "for lease" sign out front. He was asking $2,300/month It was there in April...May...June...July... About August, he backed off on the rent asked. Back to the $2,000/month I had been paying. The sign was removed in late September, but I don't know what the final rental price was. It's clear that when you add up the several months of lost rental income and the Real Estate agent's "finders fee," the landlord must have lost out big-time.
Shooby said:Hmmm does that mean I should think about lowering rent for my tenants. I am renting out a 2/2 in westpark for about $1900 a month right now.
Axiom said:GoIllini said:Until last April, I was living in a private party 2 bedroom rental in University Park that was $2,000/month. The landlord sent me a notice of a rent increase and said his R/E agent had told him rents were increasing. No negotiation possible, even though I sent him several comps at lower prices. That, combined with the overall disrepair of the unit, the ancient, avocado green oven (circa 1970) and the noisy college-student neighbors, helped me decide to move to a better place. A bit more rent, but space for a second car in the garage (or, in my case, lots of stuff) and an extra bedroom. Nice and quiet, too. Since I am still in the same neighborhood, I drove past the old place once in a while to observe the "for lease" sign out front. He was asking $2,300/month It was there in April...May...June...July... About August, he backed off on the rent asked. Back to the $2,000/month I had been paying. The sign was removed in late September, but I don't know what the final rental price was. It's clear that when you add up the several months of lost rental income and the Real Estate agent's "finders fee," the landlord must have lost out big-time.
I bet I'll be able to share a similar story soon, except mine might have an even more dramatic ending.
Our lease just went month to month, so we did some research on current prices in our neighborhood. Yep, definitely lower than what we locked into a year ago. We approached our landlord with the information.
The response... "I really want you to stay, but I have an ARM that just adjusted up and I actually need to raise your rent." Ummm, OK, I guess WTF pricing just because that's how much someone "needs" to get in order to make their desired profit is not limited to would be sellers. We said thanks, but no thanks and gave notice on the spot.
I fully expect our landlord to list at a crazy high rent, even though the exact floor plan has been sitting vacant for months now just a couple of streets over and at less than we've been paying.
Since the owner about popped a gasket when our rent check ended up sitting on someone's desk at their bank for a couple of extra days instead of being deposited to their account one month, I'm wondering how they will make it when they have no rent payment at all coming in?
It will be interesting to watch from my much nicer, but less expensive, new rental place.
biscuitninja said:^^^ Ax,
Did you politely explain this? I'm guessing that the genius didn't exactly try to work with you or even think to look around....
Wow, some people just don't really understand...
-bix
Rent hikes at O.C.’s biggest complexes could hit double digits in 2011, according to one industry expert. But can you guess which areas will see the highest increase?
Give yourself a gold star if you said the decidedly not-upscale towns of Buena Park and Costa Mesa.
By Axiometrics Inc.’s numbers, Buena Park will see rents jump 12.2% that year with Costa Mesa close behind at 12.0%. That’s huge. For instance, this year Buena Park’s big complex rents are expected to rise 3.4% while Costa Mesa rentals could decline 2%, says the apartment analytics firm. (See chart for Axiometrics full forecast for this year and 2011!)