Foreclosure Radar is not a good source to use to determine the size of shadow inventory

[quote author="Geotpf" date=1254431993][quote author="awgee" date=1254430694]<em>"I love how some pundits argue that the shadow inventory will cause no problem on the markets or even, that it doesn?t exist."</em>



From <a href="http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/shadow-inventory-case-study-inventory-in-the-shadows-twice-as-big-as-normal-resale-inventory-in-los-angeles-and-not-on-the-mls-or-for-public-viewing-foreclosures-and-distress-properties-clogging-t/">Dr. Housing Bubble on shadow inventory</a></blockquote>


It seems that, in that post, the good Doctor is including properties in default but not yet foreclosed upon as being part of the shadow inventory. I agree that there are a lot of that type, but at least some of those properties will not become bank owned.</blockquote>


Geotpf the common defintion of shadow inventory is "Shadow inventory is housing units that are not making it onto the public market for one reason or another.?



It is not just housing units that have been foreclosed on that the bank has not put on the MLS yet.



I think you would agree that before the bubble burst most of these people in foreclosure would just put their houses on the market and reap the reward of double digit appreciation for a home they could never afford.



Historically the cure rate for delinquent Prime mortgages was 45% now it is 6.6% so yes some of the homes you are talking about will never make it to the bank. I would guess somewhere between 6% at the worse and 45% at the best. At least that is what history tells me.



So I may agree that Foreclosure radar isn't the best place to get ALL of the info on shadow inventory we can use the data to make some fairly conservative projections about what WILL eventually come on to the market.



Conservatively 55% or all homes that are on foreclore radar will end up being a unit for sale at some point. As a worse case scenario 93.4% will end up being units for sale at some point.



I don't think you can argue that in normal times the banks and lending instutitions were processing these foreclosures faster as well.
 
[quote author="no_vaseline" date=1254433610][quote author="Geotpf" date=1254431993][quote author="awgee" date=1254430694]<em>"I love how some pundits argue that the shadow inventory will cause no problem on the markets or even, that it doesn?t exist."</em>



From <a href="http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/shadow-inventory-case-study-inventory-in-the-shadows-twice-as-big-as-normal-resale-inventory-in-los-angeles-and-not-on-the-mls-or-for-public-viewing-foreclosures-and-distress-properties-clogging-t/">Dr. Housing Bubble on shadow inventory</a></blockquote>


It seems that, in that post, the good Doctor is including properties in default but not yet foreclosed upon as being part of the shadow inventory. I agree that there are a lot of that type, but at least some of those properties will not become bank owned.</blockquote>


Considering the current 6% cure rate I've cited several times, what's a reasonable number to estimate "some"?</blockquote>
In Coto, "some" is about 1 out of 15.
 
trrenter - It really does not matter what I call it or anybody else calls it. "It" is a whole bunch of properties that are worth less than what is owed on them and they are going to either be short sales or foreclosures and are going to further add to the distressed sale market and force prices lower and lower and lower. Maybe some folks feel better if they do not call it shadow inventory. Maybe they feel better if they pretend "it" does not exist.
 
We need an inspirational of this photo:



<img src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_4C_tSMqS810/SZmZ_nkErQI/AAAAAAAADQM/Rc8OVX5iBPY/s400/Daniel+Dennett+and+atheism.JPG" alt="" />



There is no phantom inventory.
 
[quote author="no_vaseline" date=1254433610][quote author="Geotpf" date=1254431993][quote author="awgee" date=1254430694]<em>"I love how some pundits argue that the shadow inventory will cause no problem on the markets or even, that it doesn?t exist."</em>



From <a href="http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/shadow-inventory-case-study-inventory-in-the-shadows-twice-as-big-as-normal-resale-inventory-in-los-angeles-and-not-on-the-mls-or-for-public-viewing-foreclosures-and-distress-properties-clogging-t/">Dr. Housing Bubble on shadow inventory</a></blockquote>


It seems that, in that post, the good Doctor is including properties in default but not yet foreclosed upon as being part of the shadow inventory. I agree that there are a lot of that type, but at least some of those properties will not become bank owned.</blockquote>


Considering the current 6% cure rate I've cited several times, what's a reasonable number to estimate "some"?</blockquote>


Not to nit pick, but Orange County currently has 8464 NOTs. They have 8723 NODs filed in the last 90 days. They has some subset of the 3026 foreclosed and third party repo sold yet to be resold to final owners.



What percentage need a cure on the the 17187 current NODS and NOTS? While they work through the process how many new NODS will be served in the remainder of the year?



In August Orange County sold 2790 units.



20,000+ pending NODS, NOTS and previous Repos with 2790 sales in a busy August. Plus an unknown amount of additional NODS by year end.



What would you call that?
 
[quote author="No_Such_Reality" date=1254485040][quote author="no_vaseline" date=1254433610][quote author="Geotpf" date=1254431993][quote author="awgee" date=1254430694]<em>"I love how some pundits argue that the shadow inventory will cause no problem on the markets or even, that it doesn?t exist."</em>



From <a href="http://www.doctorhousingbubble.com/shadow-inventory-case-study-inventory-in-the-shadows-twice-as-big-as-normal-resale-inventory-in-los-angeles-and-not-on-the-mls-or-for-public-viewing-foreclosures-and-distress-properties-clogging-t/">Dr. Housing Bubble on shadow inventory</a></blockquote>


It seems that, in that post, the good Doctor is including properties in default but not yet foreclosed upon as being part of the shadow inventory. I agree that there are a lot of that type, but at least some of those properties will not become bank owned.</blockquote>


Considering the current 6% cure rate I've cited several times, what's a reasonable number to estimate "some"?</blockquote>


Not to nit pick, but Orange County currently has 8464 NOTs. They have 8723 NODs filed in the last 90 days. They has some subset of the 3026 foreclosed and third party repo sold yet to be resold to final owners.



What percentage need a cure on the the 17187 current NODS and NOTS? While they work through the process how many new NODS will be served in the remainder of the year?



In August Orange County sold 2790 units.



20,000+ pending NODS, NOTS and previous Repos with 2790 sales in a busy August. Plus an unknown amount of additional NODS by year end.



What would you call that?</blockquote>
A collapsing housing market.
 
[quote author="No_Such_Reality" date=1254485040]



20,000+ pending NODS, NOTS and previous Repos with 2790 sales in a busy August. Plus an unknown amount of additional NODS by year end.



What would you call that?</blockquote>


A mirage.



<img src="http://www.saharamet.com/desert/impactite/mirage.jpg" alt="" />



<em>There is no phantom inventory. This is not the inventory you are looking for.</em>
 
[quote author="No_Such_Reality" date=1254485040]



20,000+ pending NODS, NOTS and previous Repos with 2790 sales in a busy August. Plus an unknown amount of additional NODS by year end.



What would you call that?</blockquote>


Opportunity.
 
Back
Top