xsocal land merchant said:Hi folks
I haven't been on IHB for a while but my suggestion to the OP is to find a good buyers agent to represent him and since he has already selected the home he should negotiate a fair rebate from the BA. Several professional agents are involved on IHB and have been mentioned (IR2, USC).
As a long time broker I am not in favor of dual agency situations as it is usually not in the buyers favor and does put the agent at some risk.
I say this because the OP sounds very new to RE transactions and a good buyers agent would be helpful in this case rather than just a price reduction.
Awgee is correct that the amount of the commission should not be important. Only what one is paying for the property is of concern. If the BA rebates a portion of the commission to the buyer as closing costs and the buyer is happy with the price and terms of the purchase then the commission amount is moot.
Enjoy and try to keep California out of BK!
xsocal land merchant said:awgee
Long time-no chat. I hope all is well with you and your family.
From your posts here I would say the following:
1. You would have done your research and not have made such a mistake due to your diligence.
2. You would pay in gold and our main negotiation would be as to the dollar per oz price to be agreed upon. ;-)
3. You would have the right to change your mind based on the new information about the power plant since it materially affects the value. That is much like the negotiation after a buyer does the inspection and finds items that need to be corrected on a home.
How was that for a PC answer?
Enjoy and have a great day.
awgee said:Let's say I offer you $15,000, you accept and we "shake" on the deal.
If I had to pick one...they can get emotionally attached to a home (this will cause them to overpay on the buyside and list their property at too high of a price).awgee said:Oh, the irony.
Would any of the posting, or even lurking, real estate agents here care to voice the number one complaint that agents have about their clients?