Search results

You are trying so hard. First judjgement ruled ithe National Guard deployment is a violation of the 10th amendment. This Supreme Court ruling was about the ICE raids. The National Guard deployment is a separate issue. Please stop stanning on me and read.

My cousin died from Covid and left her daughter without any parents. My friend died from complications due to Covid and left her 2 kids without a mom.

Wait. Is this even about the National Guard deployment? This is regarding the ICE raids. Poor LL... So hellbent on proving me wrong he's hallucinating too. Just let go!!!

But you said there was no citation of constitutional violatiion by any court. Dancing again? And Panda and LL are probably the farthest from Irvine real.estate experts. Funny how the data we originally cited is actual data and not from opinions. So we can chalk that up to AI hallucination. And...

Did you ask about the 10th amendment ruling of the LA National Guard deployment? Because that's what you were arguing here, not Irvine hone prices. Time for you to disappear for a while when you are proven wrong by your own words.

MRNA ones were the ones that came out of Trump's Operation Warpspeed. Maybe you and LL should start using ChatGPT before you post.

Check the ruling. I believe violation of 10th Amendment is cited.

Haha LL arguing what "is" is. It's unconstitutional because it violates limits of executive power, which Trump is often doing. But what can I expect when someone citea a definition for insurrection and armed and twists it to his own liking. And that's the precedence it sets: The ruling...

Wow... Trump disagrees with RFK and some of you here and touts the benefits of vaccines. Maybe something did happen to him last week? Department of War... But I guess that is what it is. Will the National Guard be renamed to City Intruders? :)

That is what you are doing.

So much hyperbole from the hurt prognosticator. It's all subjective... if it were Dems doing it, you would claim unconstitutional and by nature, court rulings tend to set precedence. Show me how it's not unconstitutional... ChatGPT cited actual data... whereas you and morekaos just state...

Unbiased chatgpt: Here’s an objective, constitutionally grounded look at whether President Trump can lawfully mobilize the National Guard and federal forces in response to Chicago’s recent surge in violence—a particularly bloody Labor Day weekend where around 50–58 people were shot and seven to...

Exactly. Almost everything you say has political bias. That's the problem. Use your brain not your party affiliation. Anyways, this thread got derailed. Buying when interest rates were record low was a good thing, despite people saying prices are higher in low rate environments. I'd rather...

Read what you wrote. You keep spinning it and confusing yourself.

Again you didn't read what I wrote. Come back when your feelings aren't hurt or when you stop changing your claims. Ruled illegal in Cali, will set precedence for other cities. Not like it matters, we have a Prez who doesn't care about law and a guy who keeps posting in TalkIrvine with very...

Federal military are not trained for suburban crime. This is unconstitutional and the courts already ruled against it. But law means nothing when it's your side breaking it? Just like the insurrection, backed by a dishonest figurehead. It's crazy that no one is worried about this.

This is just an excuse. Crime has always been an issue in Chicago and most dense urban areas which are conveniently left leaning. Why aren't we sending in the military to take care of opioid abuse? Regardless, this is a local/state issue... not federal.

Wait... you are contradicting yourself. You are saying both should be scrutinized the same but only one should be kicked out of their position?

That's getting into some glass housing. :)

Morekaos hates it when facts and science disagree with his narrative. Smell any farts lately? 👃