Recent content by WINEX_IHB

Thanks or blame (depending on perspective) is due to a member who sent me a PM. I came back to see what it was.

I'm there.

Hmmmm, the "double thanks" trick doesn't seem to be working. So you have one "thanks" at the bottom of your post, and another inline here. Thanks.

Do you have a link?

I think I just did...

I'd recommend Toys for Tots You can find a list of drop-off locations and operating hours in Orange County here.

Not only have there been "no fewer than three", but a lot more have. And this isn't the only forum where he has accused someone of racism without reason.

I'd be willing to pay to have free markets instead of a regulated economy.

So much for the pretenses of Obama as a messianic figure. It's quite obvious that Obama isn't the second coming. Jesus was capable of putting together a cabinet...

Though economics certainly wasn't one of his strong points, McCain's proposal during the campaign to make insurance benefits taxable, and offset that by a $5,000 tax credit would have done wonders for containing health care costs. When there is no perceived cost to a benefit, consumption goes...

The government is not capable of creating wealth. It can only confiscate resources from one part of the economy to another. In doing so, a large amount is inevitably lost through inefficiencies of the government machinery itself. In fact, a large part of the reason why health care insurance...

Are you denying the facts? It's pretty easy to back up the Emmanuel quotes in the article. And it's very clear that universal health care and universal college tuition on the tax payers dime won't help the economy. And the tax increases coming are even worse.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/03/a_dishonest_gimmicky_budget.html Deception at Core of Obama Plans By Charles Krauthammer WASHINGTON -- Forget the pork. Forget the waste. Forget the 8,570 earmarks in a bill supported by a president who poses as the scourge of earmarks. Forget...

That's a nice TV. I looked closely at the Sharp Aquos line, but ended up getting a Panasonic plasma.

That's good. I wouldn't consider using a computer with anything with a lower resolution. But even as is, you will find that image quality suffers. A 1080p TV has a resolution of 1920x1080. The 30" Dell monitor that I am using right now has a max resolution of 2560x1600. In non-technical...