California Senate Set to Hear Rent Control Bill

momopi

Well-known member
https://www.connect.media/california-senate-set-to-hear-rent-control-bill/

California Senate Set to Hear Rent Control Bill
June 24, 2019

A California bill aimed at applying rent control across the state is set to receive its first hearing in the state Senate. The Senate Judiciary Committee will consider AB 1482 by Assemblyman David Chiu, D-San Francisco on July 9th.

The proposed bill would apply rent control to all types of housing in every city and county in California. The bill surfaced despite the overwhelming defeat of Proposition 10, a statewide rent control bill on last November?s ballot.

The California Apartment Association remains opposed to the bill, despite several amendments promised by Chiu, including:

? Increasing the annual cap on rent increases from CPI plus 5% to CPI plus 7%, the same cap adopted by Oregon.
? Exempting owners with 10 or fewer single-family homes.
? Sunsetting the bill in three years, but with the option to renew.


Had Chiu not agreed to these amendments, the bill would have died on the Assembly floor, notes the CAA?s Mike Nemeth. ?The California Association of Realtors, however, responded by lifting its opposition. And with the Realtors neutral, AB 1482 received enough votes to advance to the Senate,? he says.

Chiu has not yet incorporated the amendments into his bill, but will likely do so in early July. Regardless, Nemeth points out the legislation still lacks assurances that future legislatures won?t lower the annual cap on rent increases. ?To bring stability to the marketplace, CAA has urged Chiu to lock that cap in place and prohibit new rent control laws. The author has declined to do so,? notes Nemeth.

?Moreover, allowing rent control on buildings as new as 10 years old would reduce, if not eliminate, new rental housing,? he says.

CAA argues, facing a cap subject to change, investors could take their money out of state or apply it to other ventures. California?s housing shortage, meanwhile, will worsen. CAA continues to advocate for legislation that would increase California?s housing stock, not stifle it, says Nemeth.


https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201920200AB1482
 
?_?  A bit confused on the exemptions.  Why exempt someone who owns 10 SFR's but not another who owns an 8 unit apartment building?
 
momopi said:
?_?  A bit confused on the exemptions.  Why exempt someone who owns 10 SFR's but not another who owns an 8 unit apartment building?

perhaps that's why the ca apartment association remains opposed

ca politicians know what's best for us though! gotta ram this one through even though we shot down prop 10  60/40 ;)
 
I think people who want to represent others via government ought to show they can ace econ 101 and score reasonably well on an IQ test prior to being allowed to run.  Anytime price controls are enacted, the black market will rise to bridge the gap between the law and the free market.
 
The SFR exclusion was to appease the CAR and to limit the impact on SFR prices for decent, hardworking California families (for those who own homes already; anyone looking to buy, fuckem, they're probably on the fringe of society anyway).  But an evil rich landlord who owns an 8-unit apartment building deserves to be in the cross hairs when we stick it to the man.
 
How would the 10 or fewer single family homes work? Everyone in the "class" that would just buy 10+ SFR would buy each property in a separate LLC or something. It would be quite impossible to enforce.
 
Cares said:
How would the 10 or fewer single family homes work? Everyone in the "class" that would just buy 10+ SFR would buy each property in a separate LLC or something. It would be quite impossible to enforce.

or put them in the names of their spouse, children, relatives, etc. just like all other workarounds
 
Back
Top