Author Topic: SCOTUS  (Read 115553 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Liar Loan

  • Certified Irvine Addict
  • ****
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 818
  • -Received: 531
  • Posts: 2677
  • Don't fight the Fed.
Re: SCOTUS
« Reply #630 on: March 23, 2022, 01:38:19 PM »
You're talking about Kamala... I thought you were talking about Kentaji Brown Jackson.

@morekaos: So is Kentaji bright enough or not? You keep mixing your people up... you are Bidening.

I didn't mix anyone up, you did (better reading comprehension). ;D ;D >:D 

This is classic.  IHO is showing his age for sure.

Offline irvinehomeowner

  • The Unicorn Hunter
  • Certified Irvine Addict
  • ****
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 2785
  • -Received: 4109
  • Posts: 23959
  • 3CWG
Re: SCOTUS
« Reply #631 on: March 23, 2022, 06:17:58 PM »
You're talking about Kamala... I thought you were talking about Kentaji Brown Jackson.

@morekaos: So is Kentaji bright enough or not? You keep mixing your people up... you are Bidening.

I didn't mix anyone up, you did (better reading comprehension). ;D ;D >:D 

This is classic.  IHO is showing his age for sure.
Liar Loan stalking me because he still can't get over being wrong about Irvine pain... showing his pettiness... classic.
Once you go 3-car garage... your junk can never go back.
3CWG: 3-Car Wide Garage
FCB: Foreign Cash Buyer
I recommend:
www.irvinerealtorsite.com
member: Soylent Green Is People (loans/refis)

Offline irvinehomeowner

  • The Unicorn Hunter
  • Certified Irvine Addict
  • ****
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 2785
  • -Received: 4109
  • Posts: 23959
  • 3CWG
Re: SCOTUS
« Reply #632 on: March 23, 2022, 06:23:08 PM »
Here we go...He can nominate a black woman and keep his campaign promise, and dump his crappy VP and kill three birds with one stone.  I just don't think she is bright enough to get through the confirmation process.  In leu of that threefer...here are a few of his other choices.   Any way you cut it, it's going to be a push for the court.

@morekaos: Here is your quote. When you say "you don't think she is bright enough to get through the confirmation process"... who are you talking about?

And then when I asked you, this was your answer:

I met her once, long ago...have several friends in California government...one at the assembly level and one at the congressional level.  The word that all of them use to describe Kamala?...."Vapid".  Turn off the lights and the teleprompter and she has nothing to say..It's scary she is in the position she's in but to go through a public Senate confirmation hearing would be truly embarrassing. Not our best and brightest.

I'm asking about Kantaji and you are answering with some situation with Kamala.

It's not my reading comprehension, it's your sentence structure which is why I'm asking for clarification.
Once you go 3-car garage... your junk can never go back.
3CWG: 3-Car Wide Garage
FCB: Foreign Cash Buyer
I recommend:
www.irvinerealtorsite.com
member: Soylent Green Is People (loans/refis)

Offline morekaos

  • Certified Irvine Addict
  • ****
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 669
  • -Received: 602
  • Posts: 6341
Re: SCOTUS
« Reply #633 on: March 23, 2022, 06:43:54 PM »
I just don't think she is bright enough to get through the confirmation process.

What are you saying here? How do you know this?

I was talking about Kamala the whole time…re read the original post. You then ask how I know this…(you think I’m talking about Kantaji, she hadn’t even been nominated yet.) I answer about Kamala. …you read it wrong. I was consistent.
« Last Edit: March 23, 2022, 07:25:48 PM by morekaos »

Offline irvinehomeowner

  • The Unicorn Hunter
  • Certified Irvine Addict
  • ****
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 2785
  • -Received: 4109
  • Posts: 23959
  • 3CWG
Re: SCOTUS
« Reply #634 on: March 24, 2022, 12:21:16 AM »
On Jan 26, we already knew 4 possible candidates and Kantaji was one of them. When you talk about the confirmation process, it seems like you are referring to the candidates (why would Kamala be going through a confirmation process?).

Not even sure why you are talking about Kamala in a SCOTUS thread but I think you can understand my confusion here.

So let's level set... are you okay with Kantaji?
Once you go 3-car garage... your junk can never go back.
3CWG: 3-Car Wide Garage
FCB: Foreign Cash Buyer
I recommend:
www.irvinerealtorsite.com
member: Soylent Green Is People (loans/refis)

Offline morekaos

  • Certified Irvine Addict
  • ****
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 669
  • -Received: 602
  • Posts: 6341
Re: SCOTUS
« Reply #635 on: March 24, 2022, 08:17:04 AM »
On Jan 26, we already knew 4 possible candidates and Kantaji was one of them. When you talk about the confirmation process, it seems like you are referring to the candidates (why would Kamala be going through a confirmation process?).

Not even sure why you are talking about Kamala in a SCOTUS thread but I think you can understand my confusion here.

So let's level set... are you okay with Kantaji?

It was more of an observation that the opening gave Brandon the opportunity to dump his vapid VP and nominate a successor in one easy shot but she probably was too stupid to make it through the confirmation process...could kill a bunch of birds with one stone.  As for this confirmation it is a push for the court so it is not surprising to me that Brandon nominated a partisan who can't even answer simple questions about what a woman is or whether a fetus is racist...instead she evaded the obvious answers to hide a future agenda.  Is she qualified?...probably...do I support her nomination..NO. 

The following member(s) thanked this post:


Offline OCtoSV

  • Yearning for 949 / 714
  • **
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 89
  • -Received: 86
  • Posts: 459
Re: SCOTUS
« Reply #636 on: March 24, 2022, 08:23:59 AM »
Cruz was on fire yesterday. This nominee's testimony will be juicy fodder for the GOP in the midterms. I'm getting a copy of Anti Racist Baby.

Offline irvinehomeowner

  • The Unicorn Hunter
  • Certified Irvine Addict
  • ****
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 2785
  • -Received: 4109
  • Posts: 23959
  • 3CWG
Re: SCOTUS
« Reply #637 on: March 24, 2022, 09:02:09 AM »
On Jan 26, we already knew 4 possible candidates and Kantaji was one of them. When you talk about the confirmation process, it seems like you are referring to the candidates (why would Kamala be going through a confirmation process?).

Not even sure why you are talking about Kamala in a SCOTUS thread but I think you can understand my confusion here.

So let's level set... are you okay with Kantaji?

It was more of an observation that the opening gave Brandon the opportunity to dump his vapid VP and nominate a successor in one easy shot but she probably was too stupid to make it through the confirmation process...could kill a bunch of birds with one stone.  As for this confirmation it is a push for the court so it is not surprising to me that Brandon nominated a partisan who can't even answer simple questions about what a woman is or whether a fetus is racist...instead she evaded the obvious answers to hide a future agenda.  Is she qualified?...probably...do I support her nomination..NO. 

@morekaos: Thanks for clearing that up... sort of. Who is "too stupid" here? Sounds like you're talking about someone else now. :)

Just trying to understand your position. I don't usually take someone's assessment of intelligence without context and sounds like you're just making a statement of opinion rather than fact.

I will agree that Kamala's reputation seems... mean? Much like Hillary... but I have no proof or knowledge of that like you would.
Once you go 3-car garage... your junk can never go back.
3CWG: 3-Car Wide Garage
FCB: Foreign Cash Buyer
I recommend:
www.irvinerealtorsite.com
member: Soylent Green Is People (loans/refis)

Offline morekaos

  • Certified Irvine Addict
  • ****
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 669
  • -Received: 602
  • Posts: 6341
Re: SCOTUS
« Reply #638 on: March 24, 2022, 09:03:19 AM »
Omg he was so funny….


CRUZ: "I’m a Hispanic man, could I decide if I was an Asian man. Would I have the ability to be an Asian man and challenge Harvard’s discrimination because I made that decision?”

Offline Soylent Green Is People

  • Abiding Dude. Housing focused NMLS Licensed
  • Certified Irvine Addict
  • ****
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 1128
  • -Received: 1294
  • Posts: 2801
  • Gender: Male
  • Isaiah 58: 6-11
Re: SCOTUS
« Reply #639 on: March 24, 2022, 06:36:35 PM »
Cruz went about this the wrong way. I'd ask it in this manner to get an answer of legal substance.

"I am a man. I've committed a crime. I'm in your present courtroom - not the Supreme Court, as you are assigned to judge my case. This morning, I now identify as female... a 10 year old female. My view of reality is my truth, and truth is what the law is there to protect. Are you now required to re-assign my case to Juvenile Court, and also remand me to a female only youth facility?

If not, why not?

The candidate for SCOTUS cannot comment on a future issue before the court. A candidate can comment on a case that would be brought to their own court.

This will be another 51/50 vote and all the bread and circus machinations we've seen over the past few days is not going to move the needle. 51/50... appropriate for the crazy times we're in, no?
My .02c

SGIP

 

Talk Irvine Links

[Recent Posts]
[FAQ / Rules]

Site Supporters


Recent Posts

Re: Shady Siam Station in Irvine by washingtoncaly
[Today at 08:22:15 PM]


Re: Oil by morekaos
[Today at 08:00:20 PM]


Re: Retail Openings and Closures by zovall
[Today at 07:35:15 PM]


Re: Oil by nosuchreality
[Today at 06:36:34 PM]


Re: EV/Plug-in/Other vehicles by USCTrojanCPA
[Today at 06:08:13 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2022, SimplePortal