Author Topic: Petaluma at Eastwood  (Read 79530 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline lnc

  • Certified Irvine Addict
  • ****
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 538
  • -Received: 1022
  • Posts: 3067
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #15 on: February 13, 2016, 10:33:44 PM »
OP, you mentioned 106 in Phase I of Eastwood, and 168 in Phase II of Eastwood.

By phase I, i'm assuming that includes the whole Petaluma area near irvine blvd.
Where is phase II located on the map?

 
Petaluma extension (168 units) is going to be located in either lot 8 or lot 9 (Can't remember exactly which but more likely it's lot 9)
 


Offline acf

  • Yearning for 949 / 714
  • **
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 35
  • -Received: 22
  • Posts: 358
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #16 on: February 13, 2016, 10:43:36 PM »
Thanks Inc.

Waiting for Petaluma phase II almost seems like a better idea to me, seeing as how it's in a better location - away from irvine blvd and sheltered in the middle of the community.

Offline soyi

  • Yearning for 949 / 714
  • **
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 8
  • -Received: 10
  • Posts: 114
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #17 on: February 14, 2016, 07:18:14 AM »
Thanks Inc.

Waiting for Petaluma phase II almost seems like a better idea to me, seeing as how it's in a better location - away from irvine blvd and sheltered in the middle of the community.

Phase 2 is actually closed to Irvine Blvd. Phases work south.

They've sold more than 4 homes already.

Offline AW

  • Certified Irvine Addict
  • ****
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 45
  • -Received: 167
  • Posts: 1687
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #18 on: February 14, 2016, 07:34:22 AM »
I think they meant the second sets that's on lot 8 or 9 on the map above, not second release that's move in ready in a couple months

Offline lnc

  • Certified Irvine Addict
  • ****
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 538
  • -Received: 1022
  • Posts: 3067
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #19 on: February 14, 2016, 07:43:18 AM »
Thanks Inc.

Waiting for Petaluma phase II almost seems like a better idea to me, seeing as how it's in a better location - away from irvine blvd and sheltered in the middle of the community.

One thing to consider and it depends on exactly where the extension site is located, it might be too close to the cell tower. 

Offline acf

  • Yearning for 949 / 714
  • **
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 35
  • -Received: 22
  • Posts: 358
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #20 on: February 14, 2016, 10:12:25 AM »
Inc, I did notice the cell tower proximity to lot 8 and 9. How do we know what a safe distance from it is though?

Looks like the choice is between Irvine Blvd road noise and cancer radiation.

Offline iacrenter

  • Certified Irvine Addict
  • ****
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 392
  • -Received: 591
  • Posts: 3017
  • Gender: Male
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #21 on: February 14, 2016, 01:14:24 PM »
Inc, I did notice the cell tower proximity to lot 8 and 9. How do we know what a safe distance from it is though?

Looks like the choice is between Irvine Blvd road noise and cancer radiation.

The cancer will be worth it. Just think about how fast your cell connection will be.

Offline lnc

  • Certified Irvine Addict
  • ****
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 538
  • -Received: 1022
  • Posts: 3067
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #22 on: February 14, 2016, 03:34:19 PM »
Inc, I did notice the cell tower proximity to lot 8 and 9. How do we know what a safe distance from it is though?

Looks like the choice is between Irvine Blvd road noise and cancer radiation.

I would prefer a lot at current Petaluma location that are more inner, farther away from Irvine Blvd than the extension site. 

We have a cell tower put up in CV about a year after the village opened, see CV cell tower discussion here.  And one TI member post a link for an interesting read from American Cancer Soiciey regarding to cell tower.  http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancercauses/othercarcinogens/athome/cellular-phone-towers

Offline ChasingRainbows

  • Yearning for 949 / 714
  • **
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 56
  • -Received: 13
  • Posts: 147
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #23 on: February 14, 2016, 06:51:50 PM »
Phase 1: 9 homes all sold
Phase 2: 5 homes sold, 1 didn't have a sold button yet (residence 1)

Base property tax: 1.05%
AD tax: $1,150 / year
CFD tax: $1,700 / year
Other taxes: $164 / year
Overall effective tax rate: ~1.4%
Eastwood HOA: $125 / month

The following member(s) thanked this post:


Offline acf

  • Yearning for 949 / 714
  • **
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 35
  • -Received: 22
  • Posts: 358
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #24 on: February 14, 2016, 06:55:11 PM »
Inc, it looks like Petaluma I is right by irvine blvd, where as Petaluma II is more inside the community.

Phase 1: 9 homes all sold
Phase 2: 5 homes sold, 1 didn't have a sold button yet (residence 1)

Base property tax: 1.05%
AD tax: $1,150 / year
CFD tax: $1,700 / year
Other taxes: $164 / year
Overall effective tax rate: ~1.4%
Eastwood HOA: $125 / month

Inc, I did notice the cell tower proximity to lot 8 and 9. How do we know what a safe distance from it is though?

Looks like the choice is between Irvine Blvd road noise and cancer radiation.

I would prefer a lot at current Petaluma location that are more inner, farther away from Irvine Blvd than the extension site. 

We have a cell tower put up in CV about a year after the village opened, see CV cell tower discussion here.  And one TI member post a link for an interesting read from American Cancer Soiciey regarding to cell tower.  http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancercauses/othercarcinogens/athome/cellular-phone-towers

Offline lnc

  • Certified Irvine Addict
  • ****
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 538
  • -Received: 1022
  • Posts: 3067
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #25 on: February 14, 2016, 08:14:43 PM »
Inc, it looks like Petaluma I is right by irvine blvd, where as Petaluma II is more inside the community.

That's good to know. 

If Petaluma's sale continues at current pace, they should roll out their extension site by the year end. 

Offline USCTrojanCPA

  • Your CPA Realtor
  • Certified Irvine Addict
  • ****
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 2162
  • -Received: 1688
  • Posts: 8376
  • Gender: Male
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #26 on: February 15, 2016, 12:52:32 AM »
San Mateo was the best selling tract at Stonegate (3 phases) and it's safe to assume that Petaluma will be the best selling tract in Eastwood.  I wouldn't be surprised if you get a 3rd phase of Petaluma.  I don't think Marin will sell that well.
Martin Mania, CPA
AgencyOne
CA BRE License # 01799007
CA CPA License # 107675
mmania001@yahoo.com
714-747-3884 cell

Often imitated....Never duplicated!

Offline soyi

  • Yearning for 949 / 714
  • **
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 8
  • -Received: 10
  • Posts: 114
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #27 on: February 15, 2016, 02:48:35 PM »
Phase 1 and 2 are sold out! Anyone know when Phase 3 will come out?

Offline acf

  • Yearning for 949 / 714
  • **
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 35
  • -Received: 22
  • Posts: 358
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #28 on: February 15, 2016, 10:03:27 PM »
So "if" the cell tower is not dangerous given the studies shown (Although I have googled other studies that say otherwise), can we all agree that Petaluma II built on lot 8 or 9 is better than the current Petaluma I location near Irvine blvd?

Edit: I guess it depends if Petaluma II is located right next to Jeffery road, or more to the inside of the community. Thoughts?

Offline fishfinder333

  • Tourist
  • *
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 2
  • -Received: 2
  • Posts: 98
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #29 on: February 16, 2016, 10:06:14 AM »
So "if" the cell tower is not dangerous given the studies shown (Although I have googled other studies that say otherwise), can we all agree that Petaluma II built on lot 8 or 9 is better than the current Petaluma I location near Irvine blvd?

Edit: I guess it depends if Petaluma II is located right next to Jeffery road, or more to the inside of the community. Thoughts?

From what I have read, you want to be at least a 1/4 mile away from cell towers to be safe.

At the end of the day, cell tower studies are conflicting. Until there are concrete evidence and studies, why would anyone want to put their family at risk of cancer?

A lot of these buyers overlook cell towers at Eastwood, contamination at Beacon Park and get caught up in the hype of Irvine. So sad.

 

 

Talk Irvine Links

[Recent Posts]
[FAQ / Rules]

Site Supporters



Related Links

Recent Posts