Author Topic: Petaluma at Eastwood  (Read 79507 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline MYOB

  • Tourist
  • *
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 0
  • -Received: 40
  • Posts: 30
Petaluma at Eastwood
« on: October 06, 2015, 10:18:29 AM »
Irvine Pacific (fee-built by The New Home Company)
106 in Phase I of Eastwood, 168 in Phase II of Eastwood
1,684 to 1,898 square feet
3 Bedrooms, 2.5 to 3 Bathrooms
Opening 2016 (Model Construction Begins Now)

These are similar to Jasmine with upper balconies, new exteriors, etc.



Offline MYOB

  • Tourist
  • *
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 0
  • -Received: 40
  • Posts: 30
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2015, 07:53:58 PM »
Sneak peek – 1st floor layout

The following member(s) thanked this post:


Offline LiteThru

  • Newbie
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 2
  • -Received: 0
  • Posts: 3
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #2 on: October 30, 2015, 07:01:35 PM »
Any idea about the price level?

Offline soyi

  • Yearning for 949 / 714
  • **
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 8
  • -Received: 10
  • Posts: 114
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #3 on: October 30, 2015, 11:56:20 PM »
Any idea about the price level?

who knows, but just the thought of not being able to move in until next Christmas makes me sad panda. Eastwood is a distant dream.

Offline lnc

  • Certified Irvine Addict
  • ****
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 538
  • -Received: 1022
  • Posts: 3067
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #4 on: October 31, 2015, 06:34:39 PM »
Did some digging, looks like Petaluma is the project VTTM 17851 in the document.

http://www.irvinequickrecords.com/sirepub/cache/2/afvyz5avzo2t2mg3ouykq14o/1632080010312015054953361.PDF

Here's short summary of info obtain from the document above.  Looks like IP puts Jasmine in the mortorcourt setup.

- It's detached condo, motorcourt home setup with 3 to 6 units per lot.
- Most of the lot are 6 units motorcourt and there's 2 lot with only a single unit on them.
- 3 floor plans and all floor plans are two stories with 3 bedroom and 2.5 - 3 bath.
- Alternative 5 feet rear yard setback has been proposed for homes with optional outdoor room in some lots.
- Administrative Relief for wall height, increase allowed max. wall height of 6 feet to 7'8"- 8'8" in order to increase privacy at backyard.



« Last Edit: March 05, 2016, 06:15:57 PM by lnc »

Offline lnc

  • Certified Irvine Addict
  • ****
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 538
  • -Received: 1022
  • Posts: 3067
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #5 on: October 31, 2015, 07:02:32 PM »
Any idea about the price level?

Since it resembles Jasmine, Petaluma's price should be similar to Jasmine's mid $700k to low $800k price range.

The following member(s) thanked this post:


Offline lnc

  • Certified Irvine Addict
  • ****
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 538
  • -Received: 1022
  • Posts: 3067
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #6 on: February 10, 2016, 07:52:03 PM »
While comparing Jasmine and Petaluma's floor plan, I notice one significant improvement in Petaluma's floor plan over Jasmin's. We have a discussion here about how useless the conservatory is and in Petaluma, there's no optional conservatory and instead an optional expanded dinning area.  I like this expanded dinning option way better than the conservatory and I think a lot of you will agree with me.

Take a look at the pic below that compare Jasmine plan 3 with conservatory vs Petaluma plan 3.

Offline lnc

  • Certified Irvine Addict
  • ****
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 538
  • -Received: 1022
  • Posts: 3067
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #7 on: February 10, 2016, 08:01:59 PM »
Also some improvement noted on Petaluma plan 3's 2nd floor over Jasmin's.  The expanded dinning area on the first floor also expands some some space for the 2nd floor and allows Petaluma to add a small tech space. 

As I recall in both Jasmine and San Mateo, the plan 3 is the most popular floor plan.  With optional expanded dinning area and tech space on the 2nd floor,  that's pretty significant improvement on the Petaluma plan 3 over its predecessors.   

Offline Irvine Dream

  • O.C. Resident
  • ***
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 8
  • -Received: 111
  • Posts: 798
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #8 on: February 10, 2016, 08:13:30 PM »
I am not sure if the second floor tech space is an improvement,  The second bath is now further away from the bedrooms, kind of feel yucky to have  to go past the tech space to the toilet

Offline paydawg

  • O.C. Resident
  • ***
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 41
  • -Received: 91
  • Posts: 748
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #9 on: February 10, 2016, 10:08:51 PM »
.
« Last Edit: Today at 09:35:23 AM by paydawg »
Thanks in advance for the 'thanks'!!

Offline bones

  • Certified Irvine Addict
  • ****
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 196
  • -Received: 1097
  • Posts: 4472
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #10 on: February 10, 2016, 10:10:44 PM »
While comparing Jasmine and Petaluma's floor plan, I notice one significant improvement in Petaluma's floor plan over Jasmin's. We have a discussion here about how useless the conservatory is and in Petaluma, there's no optional conservatory and instead an optional expanded dinning area.  I like this expanded dinning option way better than the conservatory and I think a lot of you will agree with me.

Take a look at the pic below that compare Jasmine plan 3 with conservatory vs Petaluma plan 3.

Expanded dining?  Why not just give people a correctly sized dining room to begin with?  I don't understand why "basics" should be upgrades.

The following member(s) thanked this post:



Offline Zenyatta1

  • Tourist
  • *
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 10
  • -Received: 4
  • Posts: 27
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #12 on: February 11, 2016, 11:02:17 AM »
I disagree, because the Conservatory is not useless from my point of view.  It's an open space that we'll be using as my child's play area during the day.  It can also be a place to put an air mattress for visitors.  It's a great place to set up a Christmas tree when the time comes.  And my husband will be using it some evenings to host poker night (collapsible table).  A flex space that can be used for whatever is needed is extremely useful in my opinion.  An expanded dining room does not allow for any of those things.


While comparing Jasmine and Petaluma's floor plan, I notice one significant improvement in Petaluma's floor plan over Jasmin's. We have a discussion here about how useless the conservatory is and in Petaluma, there's no optional conservatory and instead an optional expanded dinning area.  I like this expanded dinning option way better than the conservatory and I think a lot of you will agree with me.

Take a look at the pic below that compare Jasmine plan 3 with conservatory vs Petaluma plan 3.

Offline acf

  • Yearning for 949 / 714
  • **
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 35
  • -Received: 22
  • Posts: 358
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #13 on: February 13, 2016, 06:10:27 PM »
OP, you mentioned 106 in Phase I of Eastwood, and 168 in Phase II of Eastwood.

By phase I, i'm assuming that includes the whole Petaluma area near irvine blvd.
Where is phase II located on the map?

Offline The California Court Company

  • What's this?
  • Certified Irvine Addict
  • ****
  • Thanks
  • -Given: 377
  • -Received: 322
  • Posts: 1768
Re: Petaluma at Eastwood
« Reply #14 on: February 13, 2016, 07:58:07 PM »
The name is not FCB friendly what is TIC thinking?
"Should any Person come into contact with such fruit, soil or groundwater, such Person is advised to wash thoroughly with soap and water and seek immediate medical attention"-Augusta Disclosure, Tustin Legacy

"You'll probably be able to buy a 4BR detached home in Quail Hill for $150,000."-IndieDev

 

Talk Irvine Links

[Recent Posts]
[FAQ / Rules]

Site Supporters



Related Links

Recent Posts