Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
1
Irvine Real Estate / Re: Newer Home vs Older Home
« Last post by Mety on Today at 07:46:54 AM »
I'm debating whether to buy a home in Northpark vs the Great Park. In Northpark, I get a guard gated community, 5 pools, tennis courts, lower taxes and lower HOA...and my own driveway. In the Great Park, I get a Motor Court, NEW home, and higher taxes. What would buyers prefer whenever I want to sell?

Based on what you wrote, looks like you have much more pros from NP. NP is a Tustin school district so that's something you might want to consider also.

I would choose NP unless the home needs too many repairs and re-upgrades for I think it's a better location and I like thier amenities too.
2
Irvine Real Estate / Re: More Homes Being Listed - Irvine
« Last post by Halos on Today at 07:33:57 AM »
I seem to be seing more homes being listed AND a lot of price reductions lately. Their is talk of a bubble as I'm sure most know....Do you think a home in Northpark would sell faster than a home at the Great Park or Porola Springs since it is Guard Gated, has 5 pools, tennis courts, lower HOA, etc OR would buyers still prefer a newer home even though you might not get your own drive way since everthing under $1.5 is in a motor court...lol

Sales down 20% YoY in So Cal
Inventory up 213% YoY in So Cal

Global luxury RE is slowing down everywhere. Definitely in a bubble, with price declines just starting.

I think Northpark would be a much better choice than GP or PS.
3
Irvine Real Estate / Re: Newer Home vs Older Home
« Last post by paydawg on Today at 07:27:00 AM »
You're going to receive different answers.  Too many unknowns, plus it boils down to a matter of preference.  I know many people that steer clear from the extra taxes and others that stay clear of older homes.  I know you're looking for guidance, but you're probably not going to get what you want here.  Good Luck.
4
Irvine Real Estate / Re: Newer Home vs Older Home
« Last post by irvinehomeowner on Today at 07:12:07 AM »
If you plan to live in this for 5+ years, you should focus on what *you* prefer... and we can't know what buyers prefer that many years down the line.

If you ask me, I would rather have the driveway and lower taxes (the guard gate is not a pro for me). But it's hard to answer this question without seeing the floorplan... assuming the price is the same.
5
Irvine Real Estate / Re: Listing homes with Redfin
« Last post by Kings on Today at 06:52:25 AM »
I also swear that Redfin listed homes use higher resolution images (on Redfin site and app) than other homes.

For instance look at the quality of the images here:
https://www.redfin.com/CA/Irvine/176-Fieldwood-92618/home/51684911

Much clearer IMO than the others not listed by Redfin.  If you look closely you will see it.  Even if you don’t look closely I think subconsciously you can tell that’s probably what they’re hoping for.

nice catch. if you download the first picture for this property on zillow and inspect the details, the resolution is 1024 x 678 and 152 kb, while the same picture (picture #16 on redfin) is 2160 x 1440 and 1.23 mb

i would suspect this has to do with the pictures being directly hosted by redfin's servers when you list with redfin, while zillow is pulling from the mls and i'm guessing the mls downgrades the size/resolution to reduce server requirements
6
Water Cooler / Re: Midterm Elections
« Last post by fortune11 on Today at 04:51:10 AM »
The article nails it ... 

Are Republicans Covering for Trump, or for Themselves?
If the N.R.A. was compromised by Russia, the whole party's in trouble.


July 20, 2018

Of all the interlocking mysteries of the Trump-Russia scandal, one that I’ve found particularly perplexing is the utter servility of congressional Republicans before a president many of them hate and believe to be compromised by a foreign power.

Yes, I know they’re thrilled about tax cuts and judges. Given how Russia has become a patron of the right globally over the last decade, some Republicans might welcome its intervention into our politics, believing that the Democrats are greater enemies of the Republic. And some are just cowards, afraid of mean tweets or base blowback.

But that doesn’t explain why, for example, Speaker Paul Ryan, a Russia hawk who is retiring in January, allowed his party to torpedo the House Intelligence Committee investigation into Russian interference in the election. Ryan, after all, knows full well who and what Donald Trump is. In a secretly recorded June 2016 conversation about Ukraine, obtained by The Washington Post, the House majority leader, Kevin McCarthy, said, “There’s two people I think Putin pays: Rohrabacher and Trump.” Far from disagreeing, Ryan said, “What’s said in the family stays in the family.” If he were patriotic — or even if he just wanted to set himself up for a comeback should Trump implode — he would have stood up for the rule of law in the Russia inquiry. It’s hard to see what he got in return for choosing not to.

This week, however, a new possibility came into focus. Perhaps, rather than covering for Trump, some Republicans are covering for themselves.

Last Friday, Robert Mueller, the special counsel, indicted 12 members of Russian military intelligence for their interference in the 2016 election. The indictment claims that in August 2016, Guccifer 2.0, a fictitious online persona adopted by the Russian hackers, “received a request for stolen documents from a candidate for the U.S. Congress.” The Russian conspirators obliged, sending “the candidate stolen documents related to the candidate’s opponent.” Congress has, so far, done nothing discernible to find out who this candidate might be.

Then, on Monday, we learned of the arrest of Maria Butina, who is accused of being  a Russian agent who  infiltrated the National Rifle Association, the most important outside organization in the Republican firmament. Legal filings in the case outline a plan to use the N.R.A. to push the Republican Party in a more pro-Russian direction.

Butina, 29, appears to have worked for Alexander Torshin, a Russian politician linked to organized crime who is the target of U.S. sanctions. She developed a romantic relationship with Paul Erickson, a conservative operative close to the N.R.A. (Court filings cite evidence it was insincere on her part.) Erickson, in turn, wrote to a Trump adviser in May 2016 about using the N.R.A. to set up a back channel to the Kremlin.

The young Russian woman clearly understood the political significance of the N.R.A. In one email, court papers say, she described the central “place and influence” of the N.R.A. in the Republican Party. Through her pro-gun activism, she became a fixture of the conservative movement and was photographed with influential Republican politicians. A  Justice Department filing quotes  Torshin as  comparing her to another young, famous Russian agent: “You have upstaged Anna Chapman. She poses with toy pistols, while you are being published with real ones.”

If the N.R.A. as an organization turns out to be compromised, it would shake conservative politics to its  foundation. And this is no longer a far-fetched possibility. “I serve on both the Intelligence Committee and the Finance Committee,” Senator Ron Wyden, Democrat of Oregon, told me. “So I have a chance to really look at this through the periscope of both committees. And what I have wondered about for some time is this whole issue of whether the N.R.A. is getting subverted as a Russian asset.”
This is not a question that Republicans are eager to answer. Before Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee abruptly closed their investigation into Russian election interference, committee Democrats wanted to interview both Butina and Erickson. Their Republican colleagues refused. “If there were efforts towards a back channel towards the N.R.A., they didn’t want to know,” Representative Adam Schiff, a California Democrat who is the  ranking member on the  committee, told me. “It was too hot to handle.”

It is not surprising that Republicans would want to protect the N.R.A. According to an audit obtained by the Center for Responsive Politics, the N.R.A.’s overall spending increased by more than $100 million in 2016. “The explosion in spending came as the N.R.A. poured unprecedented amounts of money into efforts to deliver Donald Trump the White House and help Republicans hold both houses of Congress,” the center  wrote.

McClatchy has reported that the F.B.I. is investigating whether Torshin illegally funneled money to the N.R.A. to help Trump. Wyden has also been trying to trace foreign money flowing into the N.R.A., but has found little cooperation from the organization, his Republican colleagues or the Treasury Department.

“The fact is, the N.R.A. has flipped their position more times than a kid does on a summer diving board,” Wyden said of the organization’s conflicting responses to his inquiries. At this point, the N.R.A. has acknowledged receiving just over $2,500 from Russians or people living in Russia, mostly for dues payments and magazine subscriptions. But that doesn’t tell us anything about money that might have been routed through shell companies, like, for example, Bridges, the limited liability corporation that Butina and Erickson set up in South Dakota in February 2016.

Wyden said Republicans on the Intelligence Committee have thwarted his attempts to look deeply into  the Russian money trail. “The Intelligence Committee has completely ducked for cover on follow-the-money issues,” he said. (As it happens,  Richard Burr, the North Carolina Republican who heads the Senate Intelligence Committee, is one of Congress’s leading recipients of N.R.A. support.)

On Monday, a few hours after news broke of Butina’s arrest, the Treasury Department announced a new rule sparing some tax-exempt groups, including  the N.R.A.,  from having to report their large donors to the I.R.S. Wyden called the move “truly grotesque,” saying it would “make it easier for Russian dark money” to flow into American politics. You might ask who benefits. The answer is: not just Trump.

7
Irvine Real Estate / Newer Home vs Older Home
« Last post by mgc949 on Today at 03:29:57 AM »
I'm debating whether to buy a home in Northpark vs the Great Park. In Northpark, I get a guard gated community, 5 pools, tennis courts, lower taxes and lower HOA...and my own driveway. In the Great Park, I get a Motor Court, NEW home, and higher taxes. What would buyers prefer whenever I want to sell?
8
Irvine Real Estate / Re: More Homes Being Listed - Irvine
« Last post by mgc949 on Today at 03:10:28 AM »
I seem to be seing more homes being listed AND a lot of price reductions lately. Their is talk of a bubble as I'm sure most know....Do you think a home in Northpark would sell faster than a home at the Great Park or Porola Springs since it is Guard Gated, has 5 pools, tennis courts, lower HOA, etc OR would buyers still prefer a newer home even though you might not get your own drive way since everthing under $1.5 is in a motor court...lol
9
Irvine Real Estate / Re: HOT HOMES
« Last post by mgc949 on Today at 03:07:52 AM »
Hi! What are your thoughts on resale value in Northpark vs other newer villages in Irvine. You have the guard gats, 5 pools, tennis courts, etc...would this sell faster than a regular home at the Great Park, etc? Especially since HOA and taxes are less?
10
Irvine Real Estate / Re: Listing homes with Redfin
« Last post by aquabliss on Today at 01:53:21 AM »
I also swear that Redfin listed homes use higher resolution images (on Redfin site and app) than other homes.

For instance look at the quality of the images here:
https://www.redfin.com/CA/Irvine/176-Fieldwood-92618/home/51684911

Much clearer IMO than the others not listed by Redfin.  If you look closely you will see it.  Even if you don’t look closely I think subconsciously you can tell that’s probably what they’re hoping for.
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10

Talk Irvine Links

[Recent Posts]
[FAQ / Rules]

Site Supporters


Related Links

Recent Posts

Re: Newer Home vs Older Home by Mety
[Today at 07:46:54 AM]


Re: More Homes Being Listed - Irvine by Halos
[Today at 07:33:57 AM]


Re: Newer Home vs Older Home by paydawg
[Today at 07:27:00 AM]


Re: Newer Home vs Older Home by irvinehomeowner
[Today at 07:12:07 AM]


Re: Listing homes with Redfin by Kings
[Today at 06:52:25 AM]