Recent content by irvineguy

Yes, location is subjective here, and as a primary residence you'll have to pick what works for you. But from an investment stand point I would consider the fact that a home at this size and pricing point is likely a starter home for a younger family that will likely be attracted to the...

Yes you can absolutely own the land. My previous post was to point out that property line does not define detached condos, but rather by the exterior maintenance responsibility and/or ownership of the land, etc.  I fixed it so it's more clear.

Actually, no. The definition of a detached condo, once again, has nothing to do with the setback or the property line. It's defined by the ownership of the building's lot, exterior maintenance responsibility, etc. For example, you can have a detached condo as big as you want, with as much...

Ok that makes sense - my bad gasman!

5ft setback? WTF are you talking about? the extension has a 16ft setback vs 14ft. It does have a 5ft side yard ,which is standard in all new developments in Irvine. Also, the definition of a detached condo has absolutely nothing to do with its lot size. I think we will all appreciate it if you...

Cal-Court, Would you stop this madness already? You don't know for sure if she was indeed driving reckless or that the other party almost got hurt, and what she said on this forum came long after he already followed her... You know nothing about the other driver, repeatedly reminded us that...

Why did he take off then?

"Yet, no violence had followed directly from Evers? speeches, and the Court found that Evers? ?emotionally charged rhetoric . . . did not transcend the bounds of protected speech set forth in Brandenburg? Evers? speech did not constitute unprotected incitement of lawless action,989 the Court...

Instigate means to provoke or encourage, if she did have her signals on and truly just needed to make the turn, it would be hard to argue that her action was instigating. Once again, we don't know the exact circumstance so calling her the instigator is nothing more than an accusation, Btw, I...

With the president is a little trickier... feel free to read about it. But otherwise, I am constitutionally protected to say almost anything on this forum. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threatening_the_President_of_the_United_States

Doesnt mean that she "instigated" the whole thing. We don't know if it was an honest mistake or not, hence, the part we don't know. All we know is that the other driver didn't accidently follow her home...

hmmm... let me think.. following a guy home?!?

Agree with Irvinecommuter's comment above; and her comments here are no more than venting through a public forum, which is totally fine under the first amendment . Also, how did she instigate this whole thing? I thought we agreed that's the part WE DON'T KNOW.

Somebody got the point, finally.

Wow, you're even more confused than I thought. I've acknowledged numerous times that we OBVIOUS ONLY KNOW ONE SIDE OF THE STORY, and that we are BASING THIS DISCUSSION ON THIS SIDE OF THE STORY. your earlier post states: "I applaud the guy for teaching a bad female driver a lesson. driving a...